Fluffy, you might hold the world record for writing "2NT GF, what's the problem? "
Not playing Riton 2C
#21
Posted 2005-September-12, 13:39
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#22
Posted 2005-September-12, 15:09
If playing 2/1 then I'd say 2♠ to keep all options open. If not playing 2/1 then I think I would give the opps the least amount of information I can and just bid 4♥.
Tysen
Tysen
A bit of blatant self-pimping - I've got a new poker book that's getting good reviews.
#23
Posted 2005-September-12, 15:27
Flame, on Sep 12 2005, 03:35 PM, said:
there is huge gap between 2c and 3h like 2 tricks gap.
you cant be close to both.
you cant be close to both.
That's a known problem with sayc. A problem I personally like to 'fix' opening the 18-20 hand with long strong suit in 2C.
But that's just me.
#24
Posted 2005-September-12, 16:18
whereagles, on Sep 12 2005, 04:27 PM, said:
Flame, on Sep 12 2005, 03:35 PM, said:
there is huge gap between 2c and 3h like 2 tricks gap.
you cant be close to both.
you cant be close to both.
That's a known problem with sayc. A problem I personally like to 'fix' opening the 18-20 hand with long strong suit in 2C.
But that's just me.
I prefer opening at one level and rebid 4. If solid then 3nt is often an option. Easy 4h for me when given the hand.
#25
Posted 2005-September-13, 08:30
I though the common trteatment in 2/1 was that after 1M-1NT you bid 2m with 15-17 and 2NT with 18-19 isn't this standard?