Up for a light game?
#1
Posted 2005-August-28, 00:31
pass 1D 1S pass
2D Dbl 2H pass
2S pass ???
2D shows 5+ hearts (very unlikely 6, because your partner is me and I like to bid), perhaps 8-11 points. 2S shows a maximal passed hand, 3 spades and 5 hearts.
Do you agree with 2H? Do you make a move towards game?
- hrothgar
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-August-28, 00:33
#3
Posted 2005-August-28, 01:26
But ok. If pard has something like the hand he promised, say,
Qxx
AKxxx
xx
xxx
4 should make.
#4
Posted 2005-August-28, 04:13
I don't agree with 2♥, I don't have fit, so pass. Partner can retransfer with RDbl or bid something himself.
I'll bid 4♠, since my overcalls are maximum 14HCP and I'm a maximum hand.
#6
Posted 2005-August-28, 09:48
#7
Posted 2005-August-28, 10:06
QXX
AKJXX
XXX
XX
WILL JUST BID GAME.
#8
Posted 2005-August-28, 10:21
mike777, on Aug 28 2005, 12:06 PM, said:
QXX
AKJXX
XXX
XX
WILL JUST BID GAME.
Partner can not have this hand, or he would either bid 4♠ or 3♥ (fit jump).
Partner rates to have five hearts (not six, no weak two), three spades. Further, partner didn't jump to 3♥ (fit jump) but bid more encouraging than a simple 2♠ raise, or an encouraging 2♥ (transfer to 2♠) raise.
So, what is going on? Partner wanted to tell you about his five hearts, but five no where near as good as AKJxx. In fact, Most likely, AJxxx and not KJxxx. Why? Fit jumps with Ace-empty are not usually a good idea.
Second, partner is encouraging you to bid on, but he could also have jumped to 3♠ over 2♥. But if you bid 2♥ with this hand, you could be MUCH worse than what you hold, so 3♥ jump by a passed hand would be a world of risky. Even with a hand you might imagine he could hold.
Another factor is how strong a hand partner could have for his "opening pass". Since I assume you have an agreement to open "LIGHT" (good assumption, because I know you did..and because you said "I like to bid"), forcing to game is just a bit too rich for me, but invite game is just right. The only invite that makes sense here is 3♣. Just as Mike777 suggest, and it keeps 4♠. 3NT, and imprortantly 3♠ in the picture.
#9
Posted 2005-August-28, 11:39
4 others got to 3NT, all making. They all had the auction (1D)-1S-2H-3C-3NT. This is really ugly imo, I would never bid 3C over a natural 2H bid. Transfer advanced made the auction much smoother.
6 pairs got to 4S, one made it. It sure doesn't look like a good spot!
More than a dozen pairs stayed out of game.
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2005-August-28, 12:10
I hope a 1nt(8-11 hcp) response, 2nt , 3nt is not too aggressive or double dummy bidding at IMPS?
#11
Posted 2005-August-28, 12:15
Certainly this hand is FAR from a minimum overcall. I would think if pard wasn't a passed hand, we'd be making a strong move.
I like 3C, but I hadn't considered 3N as a game until it was mentioned.
WD.
#12
Posted 2005-August-28, 14:36
mike777, on Aug 28 2005, 01:10 PM, said:
I hope a 1nt(8-11 hcp) response, 2nt , 3nt is not too aggressive or double dummy bidding at IMPS?
I don't like to respond 1NT with 3-card support. Besides, I have 5 hearts, and I can show all of this.
Also, would you bid 2NT over an 8-11 1NT response? That is quite aggressive! (perhaps this is a hand for pclayton's 2C gadget??)
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2005-August-28, 14:40
pclayton, on Aug 28 2005, 01:15 PM, said:
Yes, I would think Hx or 3-card support. But notice that Free thinks that Hx is not enough when pass is available.
- hrothgar
#14
Posted 2005-August-28, 16:18
Jlall, on Aug 28 2005, 01:33 AM, said:
Likewise.
#15
Posted 2005-August-28, 19:31
whereagles, on Aug 28 2005, 08:55 AM, said:
Fit Suit Jump - a bid which shows a 5+ card suit and implies a fit (usually 4 cards if made with a jump) in partners suit
See Andy Robson's /Oliver Segal great book (Partnership Bidding @ Bridge)
which has chapter and verse on when and with what one uses this kind of call
Have a few aspirin available also!
![:)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
kvetcher
#16
Posted 2005-August-29, 05:25
Anyway, I'm not sure transfer + support as a fit-bid is that good an idea. You can bid that hand with a jump to 3♥ and keep transfer + support as semi-fit with side suit. Say..
Qx
AKxxx
xxx
xxx
One of the reasons Rubens invented his transfer advances was precisely to deal with this sort of hand via transfer + support.
#17
Posted 2005-August-29, 05:51
![:blink:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
#18
Posted 2005-August-29, 06:21
kvetcher, on Aug 29 2005, 03:31 AM, said:
whereagles, on Aug 28 2005, 08:55 AM, said:
Have a few aspirin available also!
![:blink:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Isn't it Fit Showing Jump?
#19
Posted 2005-August-29, 06:31
helene_t, on Aug 29 2005, 01:21 PM, said:
kvetcher, on Aug 29 2005, 03:31 AM, said:
whereagles, on Aug 28 2005, 08:55 AM, said:
Have a few aspirin available also!
![:blink:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Isn't it Fit Showing Jump?
indeed...
#20
Posted 2005-August-29, 08:45
Free, on Aug 29 2005, 11:51 AM, said:
![:rolleyes:](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
Well, pard is expected not to evade the transfer with doubleton support.
But anyway, you just play it differently than I. Nothing deeper than that.. lol