BBO Discussion Forums: Sort tables by number of kibitzers - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sort tables by number of kibitzers

#1 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2003-September-04, 18:17

I have a very simple suggestion -- see subject line.
The tables in a bridge club should (either by default, or after clicking on the "Kibitzers" column headline) be ordered by the number of kibitzers.

From the experiences on other game servers (for other games), I am sure this will encourage people to gather at one or two tables, adding to the "community experience" at BBO.

Regards,
Arend (alias cherdano)
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#2 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2003-September-04, 18:22

Why? Sometimes software can have too many features and this is definitely an unnecessary one.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#3 User is offline   QQSV 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Location:Near Boston Massachusetts(USA)

Posted 2003-September-17, 07:03

No; such a feature is not necessary. But it would definitely be a convenience. I know that when I am about to kibitz I frequently seek out the most kibitzed tables in order to increase the chat possibilities (and the general resulting comraderie.) I suspect that I am not alone in doing this.

If sorting by kibitzer count can be added as an option without too much trouble, I would certainly be pleased to see it.

--Q
--Q
0

#4 User is offline   bhugi 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 2003-October-13
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2003-October-16, 20:43

This is an add on, if not too difficult, it is always good to add the features.
The features will be well function when there are > 30 tables in a tourney.

It is a luxious function, not the first priority to be implemented :)
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users