barmar, on 2025-February-27, 16:45, said:
The impression I get is that the ACBL regulators believe that American players don't want comprehensive, detailed regulations like the colored books. They probably consider them too overwhelming and no one will read them.
ACBL regulations have generally been based more on establishing some general principles, and then applying them to specific cases. The problem has been that these principles are sometimes too vague; they made some improvements in the revisions of the convention charts and alert procedures a few years ago. But the general idea of keeping them short and general instead of long and detailed is still there.
I'm not sure they're wrong about what the majority of ACBL members want.
ACBL regulations have generally been based more on establishing some general principles, and then applying them to specific cases. The problem has been that these principles are sometimes too vague; they made some improvements in the revisions of the convention charts and alert procedures a few years ago. But the general idea of keeping them short and general instead of long and detailed is still there.
I'm not sure they're wrong about what the majority of ACBL members want.
Can you please provide a link to the ACBL Regulations you are referring to.
In my experience, locating and understanding ACBL regulations is considerably more difficult than accessing similar information in EBU's Blue Book.
"I'm not sure they're wrong about what the majority of ACBL members want" in what regards; convention charts, alert procedures, Laws?