mike777, on 2025-February-22, 11:38, said:
It is NOT a support double, more akin to a responsive double if anything...
Doubles are fun to use. Stop thinking of them as penalty doubles and a whole world of bridge bidding opens up..smile.
Start thinking of doubles as
1. Showing unbid suits
2. Partial support for pards suit
3, asking pard to bid 3NT with a stopper
4, competitive only, pard bid something..
5, pard I have values, but no perfect bid
6, etc
The higher the level, a bit more they lean towards penalty, each level,, but only a bit more..
How do you penalize?
That is a whole other chapter or book..
Doubles are fun, use them more often, especially on tough bidding hands
Enjoyable!
Doubles are fun to use. Stop thinking of them as penalty doubles and a whole world of bridge bidding opens up..smile.
Start thinking of doubles as
1. Showing unbid suits
2. Partial support for pards suit
3, asking pard to bid 3NT with a stopper
4, competitive only, pard bid something..
5, pard I have values, but no perfect bid
6, etc
The higher the level, a bit more they lean towards penalty, each level,, but only a bit more..
How do you penalize?
That is a whole other chapter or book..
Doubles are fun, use them more often, especially on tough bidding hands
Enjoyable!
What is the different between support double and responsive double? I think all of them are takeout doubles because all of them are a request for partner to choose an suit.
For example:
(1♥) - X - (2♥) - X is a takeout double. Both partners are short in ♥.
1♦ - (1♥) - X - (2♥) - X is also a takeout double.
The opener has shown that he does not have:
- 6 ♦
- 4 ♠
- 5 ♦ and 4 ♣
as the opener would have bid holding any of the above. So the inference is that opener has at most 5 ♦, 3 ♣ and 3 ♠, but equally opener may have 5 ♦, 3 ♣, 3 ♥ and 2 ♠ wanting to show extras, lacking a ♥ stopper to bid 2NT. It requests the responder to pick a preference.