Are you smarter than the players in our game?
#21
Posted Today, 10:20
2♣ is fine (although I'd prefer 5 clubs, after 1♥-2♣; 3♣-3♥ we're in a similar spot. Especially if 2♣ wasn't game forcing; then I have to rely on the meta-agreement again. But if we're not playing 2/1, I can't assume that, unless we've had long discussions on "what's forcing". Which can be done, but 2/1 GF is just much easier). Not sure you ever get to find the spade fit if you do, though, which if you end up being in slam, may play better. Absent a conventional system over 1M-2♣, of course; but nobody who has to be worried partner will pass 3♥ is playing one of those.
These are the auctions I live for playing Precision. Of course, if there is slam in the offing, it starts 1♣, not 1♥; but usually that's easier too, even with interference.
#22
Posted Today, 10:58
jillybean, on 2025-January-23, 07:15, said:
These players are not playing 2/1, although some have shown an interest in learning.
If you were playing with me and bid 2♣/1♥, I would show you a 6 card heart suit.
Playing the Schuler Shift
Information leak, we now know South is 46xx
How do we know South is 46xx?
#23
Posted Today, 11:57
jdiana, on 2025-January-23, 10:58, said:
I'm not sure it does
SchulerShift Structure
1M -- 2X -- ?
2Y Unchanged. 5-4 or better in the two suits
- 2M A waiting bid promising exactly a 5-card major and denying extra distribution.Could be 5-3-3-2 with stoppers in both unbid suits.
- 2NT Artificial, showing a 6+ card major.
- 3Y (non-jump)5-5 in the bid suits or 5-4 with extras.
- Raise4-card support for responder and no singleton
- 3Y (jump)Splinter raise of responder's suit.
#24
Posted Today, 12:06
jdiana, on 2025-January-23, 10:58, said:
In the first auction I support spades 45xx, in the second auction I use the SShift x6xx . What am I missing?
#25
Posted Today, 12:21
jillybean, on 2025-January-23, 12:06, said:
1h-2C
2NT= 6H and denies (non minimum hand with
4S. ). However you could argue all hands with 6h and 4s are non minimum by definition...Murky to borrow a word 😊
#26
Posted Today, 12:25
mike777, on 2025-January-23, 12:21, said:
2NT= 6H and denies (non minimum hand with
4S. ). However you could argue all hands with 6h and 4s are non minimum by definition...Murky to borrow a word 😊
Hmm
#27
Posted Today, 12:29
jillybean, on 2025-January-23, 12:06, said:
I thought you meant we would know that after your second example, at the table. I guess you meant "information leak" in the context of your post?
I'm just generally confused. AFAIK, the 2NT bid says nothing about how many spades opener has. It just shows 6 hearts.
OK - I just went back and looked again at Gumperz's article. In response to this question in the comments:
If 1H:2m,2S shows extras, presumably this means you are rebidding 2NT on a minimum hand with 6 hearts and 4 spades? I guess this works OK, it just feels a bit counter-intuitive to bypass the spade bid.
Gumperz says:
The extras shown by a reverse can be in high cards or distribution so ♠KQxx, ♥AQTxxx, ♦x, ♣xx is clearly worth a reverse into 2♠ on the auction: 1♥ -- 2♦ -- ? When the shape is only 5-4 and opener holds in the 11-13 HCP range thats when the reverse should clearly be avoided (IMO).
(This after having said earlier that 1H-2m-2S is a reverse, showing extras.)
#28
Posted Today, 12:42
jdiana, on 2025-January-23, 12:29, said:
I'm just generally confused. AFAIK, the 2NT bid says nothing about how many spades opener has. It just shows 6 hearts.
Yes which brings the discussion back full circle
6h and 4spades which do you show first?
1H-2c or 2d
?
With a clear non minimum hand I would definitely rebid 2S not 2NT.
This loudly announcing hey partner for a change I got a real hand, wake up 😊
With a typical junky minimum opener
Probably 2NT showing my 6H.
#29
Posted Today, 12:46
mike777, on 2025-January-23, 12:42, said:
With a clear non minimum hand I would definitely rebid 2S not 2NT
Silent in regards to anny extra length in the heart suit?