BBO Discussion Forums: A Matchpoint Defense - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A Matchpoint Defense

Poll: A Matchpoint Defense (5 member(s) have cast votes)

Yout play to trick three?

  1. Spade (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. Heart king (1 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  3. Small Heart (1 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  4. A third top diamond (3 votes [60.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.00%

  5. Club (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Would have let partner hold the first trick (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,386
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2024-November-30, 15:24



You are North. Partner is on lead against 4, and leads the J. You overtake and play a second high diamond, both partner and declarer following (partner had J2 and declarer T3 if it matters). What do you do at trick three? It's matchpoints, not a very strong field. For what it's worth, 3 is weak and opponents do not have detailed agreements about preempting style, but you suspect they will be conservative by modern standards.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#2 User is offline   akwoo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,391
  • Joined: 2010-November-21

Posted 2024-November-30, 18:34

Sounds like a weak enough field that most tables will be at 3 E/W or even 2 N/S, so we'd better try to set the contract.

I voted K, but if declarer is a really weak player a top diamond will work better.

In a better field I'm leading a small heart, but here the small chance that declarer's hearts are exactly 432 (so partner has trouble reading my 6) is not worth it.
0

#3 User is offline   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,141
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted Yesterday, 06:58

From the OP, AJ 7th S + CK is more likely than same trump suit + HA. So a low H should work fine?
0

#4 User is offline   akwoo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,391
  • Joined: 2010-November-21

Posted Yesterday, 12:39

View Postapollo1201, on 2024-December-01, 06:58, said:

From the OP, AJ 7th S + CK is more likely than same trump suit + HA. So a low H should work fine?


My point was that declarer makes 4S if they have AJ 7th + HA, and it seems in this field there might not be much of a difference between -620 and -650.

In theory, a low heart should work fine, but partner might think we have x xxx AKQxxx Kxx and return a club. Partner shouldn't return a club, because in that situation declarer will discard a club on a heart and we still won't get the CK, but I don't trust most of my partners to figure that out (nor would I always figure that out at the table).
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users