[Ranmit]

2/1 system, MPs.


The bidding is as given. Partner's 2♣ bid shows 6+ clubs, ~12-15 HCP, <3 hearts. You feel game should be on (even an outside chance for slam), but which one? 3NT / 4H / 5c are all candidates (it is MPs). What do you bid?

Basically, is the jump 3♥ here GF or invitational? And how should partner respond with a 3-1-3-6 distribution and no spade stopper?

---

[jillybean]

3♥ is invitational 6+ hearts, with this hand I need to create a game force.
2♠ does this and begins to show my length in hearts. I plan to bid 3♥ next to show the 6th heart.

[Ranmit]

But isn't 2♠ a kind of responder reverse showing (at least) 5-4 in hearts and spades? And after a later 3♥ bid might even imply 6-5 in the majors?

Or is 2♠ here specifically an artificial GF bid, implying nothing about spades?

[mike777]

Fwiw
I would rebid 3H inv.
I would think 2D was artificial gf...
After 3H with minimum and that shape pass



Maximum I would have bid 3NT even with no stoppers....

Fwiw2
I would take 2 spades as artificial and solid invite in clubs..
Fwiw3

That leaves 3 clubs over 2 clubs as weakish raise..blocking bid...

[jillybean]

I am going to game with this hand, so 3H is out of the question.
Partner has denied 4 spades with his 2C rebid so while 2S is technically a 'responder's reverse' it creates the force and allows partner to show 3 card heart support.
This 3613 hand is difficult to bid, I have to make a small fib and I would rather fib where I have values as partner may now be able to bid nt.
It isn't ideal, we haven't created a gf first round.

---

---

I would play this as red suits, probe for nt

(waiting for the axe to drop)

[akwoo]

You should be playing 2D as new minor forcing in this situation. So you bid 2D, artificial, at least invitational. Following that with 3H (or 4H, if partner bids 2H) will get the point across.

It's true that 5C could be right, but in most MP fields you'll rather gamble 3N than play 5C if partner doesn't have any hearts for you.

[jdiana]

I guess you're learning that there's no such thing as a simple question.

I agree that 2♠ is a responder's reverse (I guess I don't have to agree - it is that by definition ) but it doesn't necessarily promise 4 cards. This is a good summary - https://www.betterbr...ndard200905.pdf Auctions can get a little awkward when the opener rebids their suit, at least for me. 2♠ is a way to create a GF and explore for the best contract.

It seems that we have some different opinions on what a 2♦ bid would mean. When exploring for NT, my partner and I had this agreement about asking/showing stoppers: If there is only one unbid suit, then bidding that suit is asking partner if they have the suit stopped. If there are two unbid suits, then bidding a new suit is telling partner that we have the suit stopped. So, for me, 2♦ by South would be showing a stopper.

I kind of agree with Mike777 that this hand is borderline for creating a GF, but I would be fine if my partner did so. After 2♠, with a 3-1-3-6 hand, I would bid 2NT if I had a diamond stopper though I don't love bidding notrump with a singleton. It's also not ideal on this particular hand because South has only a partial stopper in spades. Just my two cents.

[jillybean]

If it was a simple game, no one would be playing it.

[mike777]

I was taught to be conservative with my game invites and be aggressive accepting game invites. I try to be consistent in that approach.
However many play differently and win.