Posted 2023-May-11, 12:54
Using a neg X in the 1D-(2C) sequence strongly implies that you can handle « all » answers, especially when you are at most invitational. That is why, although less preemptive than a 2M overcall, it is harder to defend, after all, 2 major strains are now possible.
In those cases you should strive to have one of the following type of hands, where a back-up is available in case partner (as always😇😇) picks the wrong M:
- 44 M at least, or 43 M if partner handles well the 43 fits
- a 5-cd S suit that you can try to rebid in a NF way over 2D or 2H (but with 5H it is too risky if partner bids 2S)
- have D support (4 cards) - if partner has no M, they have at least 4D
- have a C stop to bid 2N
Without backup, it is often better to pass with weak-ish (8-10) hands, as GF hands will just cue bid or bid 3NT if not interested by partner’s rebid. Those weakish hands will often have some C length which makes a reopening by partner more likely. For instance, a 9-count 4234 should pass in tempo. But 3523, 5233 or 4243 can try something.
Here, you had 11 and no points in C so passing 2C was hard even without proper back up. But that could be the winning call, opps go down while you struggle in a 43 fit at the 2 or 3 level if you say sth other than pass, when partner cant reopen.
For this reason, passing 2H could be the winning call as well, but there is probably more to gain than to lose going back to 3D: it could be a safer spot with a real fit, partner might correct to S with their 4432 hand, or less likely bid 3NT.
2S suggesting 5-cd and less points, and 3C with insufficient values, or 2NT w/o stopper and wrong siding the hand are not for me.
A former poster (Nigel, RIP) used to rank so I’ll pay a homage to him, ranking:
3D 10
Pass 7
3C 5 (at IMPs)
2S 4
2NT 1