Your lead & why?
#22
Posted 2023-May-04, 19:13
smerriman, on 2023-May-04, 16:13, said:
If West instead leads a heart - whether the 9 or low - the contract is makeable.. by winning in dummy and immediately leading low to the ten of clubs! If a declarer did that I'd be pretty suspicious
Why are we talking about heart leads? 5/6 pairs led a ♦ against NT, making +1,2,3
We were comparing these results to the pair who lead a small ♠ -1
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#23
Posted 2023-May-04, 19:41
jillybean, on 2023-May-04, 19:13, said:
We were comparing these results to the pair who lead a small ♠ -1
Well, the thread moved on a bit since then
My comment was in reply to Mike who couldn't see the spade lead working (for that reason), but could see a heart lead beating the contract - and again, it would have beat the contract at the table, despite double dummy saying otherwise.
Both cases show the human results are really quite independent from what double dummy shows, so looking and seeing there is a 'killing spade lead' misses the point.
#24
Posted 2023-May-04, 21:33
smerriman, on 2023-May-04, 19:41, said:
My comment was in reply to Mike who couldn't see the spade lead working (for that reason), but could see a heart lead beating the contract - and again, it would have beat the contract at the table, despite double dummy saying otherwise.
Both cases show the human results are really quite independent from what double dummy shows, so looking and seeing there is a 'killing spade lead' misses the point.
In fairness, my comment about the spade lead failing was made at 4:40 am, during a brief interlude involving a bathroom break😀 Id previously said that I thought a spade lead always set the contract, with good defence thereafter, but had forgotten that ducking the first diamond, if played from hand, allowed winning the second and playing a third.
#25
Posted 2023-May-04, 21:36
I don't see how winning the first spade makes it any more difficult, E has winners in all the side suits, and 2 more spades
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#26
Posted 2023-May-04, 22:31
jillybean, on 2023-May-04, 21:36, said:
I wouldn't have ducked the first diamond as East, seeing there didn't appear to be a side entry anyway.
#27
Posted 2023-May-04, 22:47
#28
Posted 2023-May-04, 22:56
the hog, on 2023-May-04, 22:47, said:
Only if they play a 4th round of spades to gift you a trick with the jack. Any other defense and you're only taking 1 spade.
#29
Posted 2023-May-05, 03:10
smerriman, on 2023-May-04, 22:56, said:
If they take he D ace and switch to a H you duck a C and now have 4C 2H 2D and 1S
#30
Posted 2023-May-05, 03:13
the hog, on 2023-May-05, 03:10, said:
Of course. But we're talking about them ducking the diamond, after which the contract cannot be made. It's really as simple as clicking the GIB button

Help
