We are missing Kx of trump, do you not consider the Grand? What is the percentage of Kx being in one hand?
Q1 & Q2
#21
Posted 2023-March-05, 13:48
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#23
Posted 2023-March-05, 14:20
jillybean, on 2023-March-05, 13:48, said:
We are missing Kx of trump, do you not consider the Grand? What is the percentage of Kx being in one hand?
Roughly but not quite 50-50. Far too high to risk a grand at imps, unless stuck or outgunned. As for mps, since on almost all hands some pair has an accident and misses the small slam, it’s still not a good idea unless desperate for a top…it needs to be 50% or better even if one assumes that nobody misses slam
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#24
Posted 2023-March-06, 02:30
I think it's fairly standard that 4N is quantitative over a 2 level transfer and RKC over a 4 level transfer.
Here, it's fairly clear I want to RKC opposite a 12-14 1N, so I would bid 4D (we play 2 under transfers at the 4 level) and then 4N over partner's 4S bid.
My principle is that 4333 hands have 3 cards in every suit, so you never make bids showing 4 card support (no super accepts, no 4 card raises).
Here, it's fairly clear I want to RKC opposite a 12-14 1N, so I would bid 4D (we play 2 under transfers at the 4 level) and then 4N over partner's 4S bid.
My principle is that 4333 hands have 3 cards in every suit, so you never make bids showing 4 card support (no super accepts, no 4 card raises).