BBO Discussion Forums: The quest for the 100% - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The quest for the 100%

#1 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-15, 02:50

I keep seeing 'The quest for the 100%' videos by Hanoi5 in BBO's newsfeed - but have never once clicked on one before, thinking it was just someone playing normal tournaments with a dream of one day scoring 100%.

I happened to click on one today.. and it's actually incredibly interesting. The idea is to play BBO's weekly free instant tournament over and over - thus knowing what the hands are, as the tournament only resets once per week (and you're compared against the same set of players who played in a real tournament some time in the past) - trying to achieve a perfect score of 100%.

So this is really nothing to do with bridge and more about figuring out ways to psyche + trick GIB into giving you extra tricks, or double an unbeatable contract - definitely up my alley. Some hands are trivial - e.g. just bid slam when it makes double dummy and nobody else bid it - but some are very tough, potentially impossible (the top score was 7NT, is there a way of trick GIB into doubling?)

So I'm definitely going to be giving this a go each week now. Posting this here in case others find this interesting too and wanted to join in.
0

#2 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-15, 03:47

I reckon there are ways to get 100% without intentionally psyching the bot, just outthinking everyone else, or being very lucky :)

EDIT Had a look at one video. Knowing all the hands and tricking a bot doesn't appeal much to me. I guess being able to know how to best use that system (with a few small variations and flexible interpetations) to get the top reasonable score on every hand would appeal more. Out of all DD contracts which are the ones that can reasonably be reached. If they are all reasonable contracts then maybe. Each to their own :)

PPS I always found it amusing being able to play that tourney over and over again. What's the point

Anynone else use Double Dummy Solver where it says that you failed to get opps to 7NTXX-6. I imagine people berating their partners
0

#3 User is offline   pilowsky 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,766
  • Joined: 2019-October-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Poland

Posted 2022-December-15, 04:01

It's a great series and very impressive.
Here's a link to his channel with the back catalogue.
Fortuna Fortis Felix
0

#4 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-18, 16:39

I have at least half given this a try, at least investigating candidate target contracts
On 4 hands I reckon just bidding slightly more ambitiously, and knowing the cards, would have achieved 4*100 - assuming the Bot plays the same
The other 4 were more difficult to work out
0

#5 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,198
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2022-December-18, 16:43

Once I saw in the "other tables" that someone got 100% on a board by rightsiding a 4 contract, holding eight hearts. The trick was to open 1NT and pass the Texas transfer.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#6 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-18, 17:11

 helene_t, on 2022-December-18, 16:43, said:

Once I saw in the "other tables" that someone got 100% on a board by rightsiding a 4 contract, holding eight hearts. The trick was to open 1NT and pass the Texas transfer.

That's pretty insane, because the people in the other tables were playing a real tournament, where they had no idea what their partner held. Much easier to score 100% in the weekly free knowing the cards!
0

#7 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-18, 21:26

Can I ask if two people in the same tourney score 100% does that count?

Regarding the quest for the 100% there do appear to be others playing the game though
0

#8 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-18, 21:57

 thepossum, on 2022-December-18, 21:26, said:

Can I ask if two people in the same tourney score 100% does that count?

Regarding the quest for the 100% there do appear to be others playing the game though

Instant tournaments take a fixed set of players from an old tournament, give you the same hands they had, and compare your scores against them as if you were one extra player in that tournament. The free weekly tournament is always the same tournament and the same players for the entire week. So you're not being compared against other people who are playing the free weekly tournament; the other scores are fixed in stone by players who didn't know what the hands were at the time.

So if you play the tournament multiple times and make the same bids / plays, you'll get the same score every time. But you're not inconveniencing anyone else by doing so, because your score won't show up if someone else plays it.

The only way you can achieve a 100% score is thus by doing *strictly better* than all of those players on every hand. Which is why in this challenge some 100%s are impossible (there were three hands where it was literally impossible to score 100% last week - like the hand where one of those older players made 7NT, so you could get only get a 100% by making 7NTx, and no matter what sequence you tried, there wasn't any situation where GIB doubles. The best you could do there was making 7NT too, and getting a score of 90something%.)
0

#9 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-21, 19:34

Tried it once (enough) with 3x100 and 4x96.4 and 1*57% Who knows how to even beat the 57%

EDIT was slightly disappointed as I had earlier thought I could see 4 100s - on second viewing I have found it - whether I can bid it or not is another matter
EDIT again - yes I could bid it 4*100 and 4*96.4 That's enough time wasted

Was hoping for the bug I have occasionally observed with 2 players getting 100% :)
0

#10 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-21, 19:55

My best scores for this week so far are:
Spoiler

0

#11 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-21, 22:58

Spoiler

0

#12 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-21, 23:14

Yes, the weekly free is the same for everyone for the whole week. Got board 5 now, so just 3 + 8 to go, though both look impossible to me.
0

#13 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-21, 23:26

Still don't know how I missed hand 6 😂
0

#14 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-21, 23:26

Dup deleted
0

#15 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-21, 23:26

Scrub that, got 100% on board 3. Just board 8 to go now.

edit - Success! 100% on all boards :) Hooray.
1

#16 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-21, 23:45

Congratulations. Maybe post your solution in another spoiler :)
0

#17 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-21, 23:55

Spoiler

0

#18 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-22, 19:54

Thx. Who knows how you find those
Will be happy with 5 fairly natural 100s :)
0

#19 User is online   thepossum 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,571
  • Joined: 2018-July-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2022-December-24, 17:03

I wasn't even going to consider this thing again but looked at this week's and can't possibly see how to get any 100s other than the one the bot already donated to me :)

Much more challenging than last week's

Checked all the double dummies, all possible leads. I'm stuck
0

#20 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,035
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-December-24, 19:32

I've made 5 of them so far with these contracts (which isn't necessarily much of a spoiler since the route to them + the play is all relevant):
Spoiler

0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users