Dummy chatting during play 2/1 ACBL
#1
Posted 2022-November-10, 17:18
I know dummy can ask partner
#1 if he is out of a suit to prevent possible revoke
@2 tell partner which hand he is in to prevent a lead from wrong hand
#3 tell partner [but not opponets] they have trick turned wrong must be done before next trick is played
I believe that is about all dummy may do.
Chatting just to talk is not proper. Correct??
Thank you
#2
Posted 2022-November-10, 18:40
#3
Posted 2022-November-11, 08:06
If there is a compelling but non-bridge reason to chat, then as barmar says.
#4
Posted 2022-November-11, 08:20
dickiegera, on 2022-November-10, 17:18, said:
I know dummy can ask partner
#1 if he is out of a suit to prevent possible revoke
#2 tell partner which hand he is in to prevent a lead from wrong hand
#3 tell partner [but not opponets] they have trick turned wrong must be done before next trick is played
I believe that is about all dummy may do.
The key phrase in #2 is "to prevent...": dummy is not allowed to say anything unless it looks imminent that partner will lead from the wrong hand. It shouldn't be a ritual reminder or an answer to a question by declarer.
There are other rights you failed to mention: for instance he can check that partner does not make him revoke, he can try to prevent any irregularity, he can bring attention to any irregularity (but only after play is finished).
#5
Posted 2022-November-12, 03:14
#6
Posted 2022-November-12, 12:30
sanst, on 2022-November-12, 03:14, said:
True, but Law 81C1 gives Director the duty and power to maintain discipline and to ensure the orderly progress of the game.
Most Directors around here (let alone at Bermuda Bowl) will ask people to play in silence and while occasional exchanges are tolerated, "just talking" or disturbing other tables is certainly not.
#7
Posted 2022-November-13, 12:22
pescetom, on 2022-November-12, 12:30, said:
Most Directors around here (let alone at Bermuda Bowl) will ask people to play in silence and while occasional exchanges are tolerated, "just talking" or disturbing other tables is certainly not.
At clubs here bridge is a social pastime, not a competitive game. Forcing everybody to shut up, would finish that. During play most players are relatively quiet, but once they have finished the four boards - it’s almost everywhere MP’s - there’s a lot of chatter. But nobody is surprised if the dummy says something, although most players know that (s)he shouldn’t interfere with the game.
#8
Posted 2022-November-13, 16:31
sanst, on 2022-November-13, 12:22, said:
I suspect we're talking about much the same thing from different cultural viewpoints. Keeping Italians totally quiet is impossible by definition, but they know they can't "just chat" during play.
Keeping the volume down at the end of the round used to be a problem here, but partly I don't concede them much time and partly our recent change to phone based scoring has them all absorbed in silence, fishing to see how they scored and what they can blame on partner.
#9
Posted 2022-November-14, 07:00
sanst, on 2022-November-13, 12:22, said:
A couple weeks ago some protracted drivel ensued during the course of several hands. My assessment was that National Champion was distracted into several IB from which a litany of irregularities emanated as well as non director calls and a bad TD ruling (when finally one was sought). It might be said that World Champion survived with some advantageous results. There were attempts to engage me in the drivel but I escaped by uttering,'That's above my pay grade.'
Personally I have found no redeeming features in using force to end chit chat and it is better to allow the perpetrators to exhaust themselves. My response is to 1. keep my trap shut and 2. do nothing until it stops which includes no bidding and no playing and no calling the TD about it 3. but if the others call the director about it that's a different story. If the objective is to minimize the length of the round this seems to work best.
#10
Posted 2022-November-18, 15:35
#11
Posted 2022-November-18, 15:43
If it's distracting, or if it moves into "assisting partner with the play", then yeah. I've been known to ask. I've even been known to call the director, if asking didn't help. Unfortunately, what I find interesting my partners can find distracting, and it's at least partially my fault...
But almost all is that kind of innocuous, nobody should be calling anyone out for it, kind of stuff.
#12
Posted 2022-November-19, 13:38
barmar, on 2022-November-18, 15:35, said:
Neither have I, nor, surprising some, I'm sure, have I done such calling myself.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#13
Posted 2022-November-19, 14:13
barmar, on 2022-November-18, 15:35, said:
I'm glad to learn I am not alone in this experience.
'Mostly' being the key word.
barmar, on 2022-November-18, 15:35, said:
I would be astounded otherwise, also because realistically there is little chance this will make any difference to the result except that Declarer is heartened and does his best.
I call out dummy (face to face) when he pretends to be deaf and declarer takes advantage to change his call, or something similar.
#14
Posted 2022-December-18, 16:41
every card Barry kept saying just take your 9tricks Sid....it did get old,
but we didnt do anything.