BBO Discussion Forums: BPO-003C - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

BPO-003C

#41 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2005-June-17, 09:43

Marlowe: I had 7 diamonds, not 6.

Mike: I do not accept with all hands. Also, this was the first time I played with this partner.

I think I agree that I should have bid 3D, but I don't think it is so clear. I do know that 3H is forcing to game. Not seeing partner's hand, it is not unlikely that my hand will produce 7 diamond tricks in a NT contract, and it might play well in a heart contract. It seemed to me that it would be worth the gamble to stretch for a vulnerable game contract at IMPs (I suspect that Ben changed the vulnerability to make a pass more appealing).
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users