BBO Discussion Forums: Lucky Landing? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lucky Landing? Robot Rebid

#1 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2021-March-31, 10:40


We had a complete zero against the robots last night at a club event. EW were the robots and bid to a 74% slam and played it well after the KC lead, cashing the ace of diamonds crossing to the ace of hearts, taking pitches on the AK of spades, crossing to the king of hearts and ruffing the heart with the 9. Basically succeeding when diamonds are 2-2 or there is a stiff honour. Impressive stuff, realising the importance of the doubleton heart.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#2 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,960
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2021-March-31, 15:02

I think you mean ruffing ♥T with the 9.
Neat indeed.
Although I am not sure what the 2♦ bid explained as 4+D is all about.
0

#3 User is offline   LBengtsson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2017-August-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2021-March-31, 15:17

DIRECTOR!
0

#4 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,062
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2021-March-31, 18:47

Odd indeed. The 2♦ part isn't even simulation based (5♦ on is); basic GIB defines 2NT as a max of 14 HCP and apparently thinks that's a worse rule to break.
A better handviewer
Reverse engineering GIB, part 1: A treatise on the insanity of bidding simulations
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users