Opening Lead partner doubles keycard response
#1
Posted 2005-June-06, 16:52
auction
1heart pass 2 clubs pass
2hearts pass 4 hearts pass
4NT pass 5 diamonds double
6 heart pass pass pass
Your lead please??
Your hand:
♠ KQXXX
♥ J
♦ QXXX
♣ 10XX
#4
Posted 2005-June-06, 17:28
#5
Posted 2005-June-06, 17:34
luke warm, on Jun 6 2005, 06:28 PM, said:
Even though P has doubled D's Jimmy goes out on a limb to lead a D so I will too.
Those who lead spades have found good reasons to not play with partner anymore.
#6
Posted 2005-June-06, 17:36
#7
Posted 2005-June-06, 17:43
#8
Posted 2005-June-06, 18:46
#9
Posted 2005-June-06, 19:34
1) My gut tells me that RHO isn't scared of a diamond lead, with a holding of say Axx. Therefore, its a good chance that Lho has that card, which might be a late entry to the clubs. Similarly, RHO isn't off 2 quick diamonds either.
2) If LHO has the AD, RHO probably has the AS. So, a spade might be into the teeth of an AJT or Axx (with the J in dummy) or AJ9.
#12
Posted 2005-June-07, 07:40
I am never leaving a trump or a club. It also sounds like we have a key card, so how best are we going to set up a trick? To mastermind with a spade lead might get you a new partner, but I certainly would consider it. It is hard to imagine a hand where partner doesn't have the diamond ACE and legnth, unless they are vul and we are not and he was suggesting a save.
One can draw up hands where a spade lead is the only one that works. I guess I would lead a diamond, out of partnership harmony if nothing else.
#13
Posted 2005-June-07, 08:05
Partner is more likely to have the DK (possibly KJ) plus a keycard.
I would lead a diamond, though I know a spade could be right.
I assume 2H was forcing or the auction is insane? Depending on their bidding methods & the meaning of 5D, the hand could be something like:
xxx
Kxx
Jx
AQJxx
A
AQJ10xx
Axx
xxx
(Why didn't declarer look for 7H? I don't know, perhaps 4H showed a minimum and he was worried about club losers)
Now admittedly the hand could equally well be the same but with declarer's pointed suits the other way round, in which case a spade lead is right, but when I have fewer diamonds than spades it is more likely that we have a second round diamond trick than a second round spade trick.
#14
Posted 2005-June-07, 08:41
#15
Posted 2005-June-07, 09:06
#16
Posted 2005-June-07, 09:25
#17
Posted 2005-June-07, 14:27
Why is partner hitting 5D for a lead with Ace of diamonds and out in that suit? The bidding suggests that declarer isn't very worried about diamond losers. KJTx is reasonable, as is AKxxx when declarer has a stiff. If the latter, and I lead the queen, I am on lead at trick 2 and might have a good idea what to lead then. As usual, my reasoning is probably demented but that's my thinking. I would also want to know if the opps play lho's bidding as a shape raise?
#18
Posted 2005-June-08, 15:36
Al_U_Card, on Jun 7 2005, 10:25 AM, said:
you hit the nail on the head! Will partner be brave enough now to insert the J♦ from ♦AJT98.
So how firm are your agreements on what a small card lead is? Does it definitely promise an honor then no problem, But with an infrequent partner what do you do?
#19
Posted 2005-June-08, 16:14
pigpenz, on Jun 8 2005, 03:36 PM, said:
So how firm are your agreements on what a small card lead is? Does it definitely promise an honor then no problem, But with an infrequent partner what do you do?
Don't think it matters what my agreement is. If I double 5D blackwood, and partner leads a small diamond, it means he had one. If he has 532, he'll lead the 5, but he'll do that from Q765 as well (or D5 alone, or...)
I said "lead a diamond, partner". He'll do that, even if he has to find one from another deck. If he has one to lead that bears some resemblance to a normal lead, that's a bonus.
Michael.
#20
Posted 2005-June-08, 18:15
In all other lay outs it will only help to squeeze partner.