mycroft, on 2020-September-25, 12:47, said:
- 1♣: I have an opener, and some clubs.
- 1♠: I have 6-10 and 4+ spades.
- 2♣: I have real clubs (6 if you're me), probably not 3 spades, probably not balanced, probably not 17 high.
- 2NT: Okay, how about 3NT?
- 3♣: No, really, this is a minimum, and only plays in clubs. I should have opened this 3♣ opposite a passed hand.
- 3NT: I don't believe you.
To give North credit, hearing 3
♣ could up-value his xx and scattered cards into "well, then, clubs should run". But I would expect that what it actually means is "I have a club void, and I don't trust you." Whether North has reason to not trust South (say, she's the person who has to rebid KJTxx "so you know I'm not short, pard", and runs away from NT on a stiff spade and cards, but doesn't want to introduce her
♥KTxx now) is an open question.
Obviously the meanings depend on style, but:
1C: I have an opening hand. Club length not defined, but (for most people) I have at least 3. Personally, in my partnerships, I promise as few as 2, but not in the I/A forum
1S: I have a 1S response. Very few experienced players require 6 for this response. I would never pass 1C with, say, KJxxx xxxx xxx x. Unlikely to hold 6S, but depends on our style for opening 2S in first seat.
2C: depends on style, in terms of does a 1N rebid promise at least 2 spades? With, say, x AJxx Kxx AJxxx, many would rebid 2C, so for most, the 2C call shows 5 or more. The point range is very wide. Top end is just below a reverse (with a 1=4=3=5 hand, for example, I’d expect 2C could deliver up to 16 hcp, and with a 6 card suit, as much as an unattractive 15)
2N: I have 4-5 spades, fewer than 4 card in either red suit, and a hand worth around 10-11 hcp, altho some pairs tend to open most 11 counts (in my partnerships, we very rarely pass even horrible 11 counts, but that style requires agreement and considerable systemic adjustments ... 14-16 notrumps, responder needs a great 13 to force to game, etc) responder should have at least some expectation of red suit stoppers. Q10xx Kxx Axxx Qx would be a reasonable 2N.
3C: please let me play 3C. I heard you. I don’t think you can make 3N, and I think 3C is better even than 2N
3N: I don’t trust you at all, partner. I’m in charge of all bidding decisions.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
+++++++++++++++++++++
Agree with CyberYeti and AL78:
Opener has something like ♠ x ♥ x x x x ♦ A ♣ A x x x x x x
Dealer has something like ♠ x x x x x ♥ A x ♦ Q x x ♣ K x x
DavidKok might be right: his 2N bid is braver than his 3N bid