BBO Discussion Forums: Defend 3N - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Defend 3N

#1 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,199
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2020-September-06, 10:35

You open 1C, showing 2+. The 2C overcall was natural. Partner finds a great lead of a low spade from Kxx. You win the A, play the 8 to partner’s King, and win the continuation. On the 4th spade, declarer pitches a diamond and partner a discouraging heart. Your play, and why?
(
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
3

#2 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,508
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2020-September-06, 10:43

If declarer has something like AQJxxx and Ax you need to return K here
1

#3 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,725
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2020-September-06, 14:01

Nice problem.

I must say the play of K to disrupt communications between declarer and dummy is not very hard to find.

In addition to the hand described by Cyberyeti, there are other hands where declarer still is unable to make 9 tricks (e.g. xxx Axx xx AQJ10x)
0

#4 User is online   pilowsky 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,815
  • Joined: 2019-October-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Poland

Posted 2020-September-06, 23:58

Thanks for that Mike great problem, - I'm looking forward to the answer - it's got me stumped.
the layout I came up with looks like this:

But, this layout is no good, because if South leads back the K, then West just collects it in hand, runs off the in hand ditching all the and then makes the contract with the remaining in dummy.

So I must have something wrong.

Answers my other question about what 2 over 1 means when 1 is a short. Thanks for that.
Fortuna Fortis Felix
0

#5 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,508
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2020-September-07, 03:30

View Postpilowsky, on 2020-September-06, 23:58, said:

Thanks for that Mike great problem, - I'm looking forward to the answer - it's got me stumped.
the layout I came up with looks like this:

But, this layout is no good, because if South leads back the K, then West just collects it in hand, runs off the in hand ditching all the and then makes the contract with the remaining in dummy.

So I must have something wrong.

Answers my other question about what 2 over 1 means when 1 is a short. Thanks for that.


You have nothing wrong, there are layouts where the contract is unbeatable, but AQJxxx or AQJ10x are not cashable without unblocking the K, returning to hand with the A taking the finesse if you're a trick short and then cashing the clubs, removing the A prematurely prevents this. It's only wrong if the 6 card club suit was cashable all the time and the heart ace was stiff or declarer had AQJ109 and Ax.
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-September-07, 05:05

View Postpilowsky, on 2020-September-06, 23:58, said:


But, this layout is no good, because if South leads back the K, then West just collects it in hand, runs off the in hand ditching all the and then makes the contract with the remaining in dummy.

So I must have something wrong.

On this layout, declarer would pitch a heart not a diamond! Also, he can make on any return.

Once you realise declarer won't pitch a singleton diamond and cut himself off dummy, it seems impossible to construct a layout where K is wrong.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#7 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,508
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2020-September-07, 05:38

View Postcherdano, on 2020-September-07, 05:05, said:

On this layout, declarer would pitch a heart not a diamond! Also, he can make on any return.

Once you realise declarer won't pitch a singleton diamond and cut himself off dummy, it seems impossible to construct a layout where K is wrong.


xxx, A, xxx, AQJ109x or xxx, Ax, xxx, AQJ109 are the two specific wrong ones, where he can only generate 8 tricks without you divesting yourself of K. he can have or not have Q
0

#8 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,199
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2020-September-07, 07:42

I had this hand at the table, and thought it was a neat hand. The return of the heart King is a textbook play. It can never be wrong, although it will often be irrelevant.

The key is that declarer may hold clubs that look like AQJxxx, and as little as 10xxx in partner’s hand will be a stopper.

Book plays like this rarely arise, so having it arise was fun

Honesty compels me to say that I didn’t get a chance to make the play. My partner, looking at the club jack in his hand, knew there was no need to kill the club suit. Concerned to kill diamonds, rather than clubs, he switched to a club to knock out that entry. However, I thought the hand was worth posting. In answer to pilowski’s post, the point is to assume one can beat the contract (especially at imps) and to picture layouts where that is possible but where one can do something about it, don’t worry about imagined layouts where the contract cannot be beaten, here, Jxx Axx x AQJ9xx was a real,possibility and the only way to beat it is to drive out the heart entry before declarer unblocks the clubs.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-September-07, 09:01

View PostCyberyeti, on 2020-September-07, 05:38, said:

xxx, A, xxx, AQJ109x or xxx, Ax, xxx, AQJ109 are the two specific wrong ones.

Ok I had missed such layouts. In the first, we have to play a low heart to break up a criss-cross squeeze in the red suits (which declarer will get right). In the second, we have to play a club because a low heart would set up a criss-cross squeeze in the red suits...
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users