Do N-S hands are better?? N-S hands have more points and E-W hands are not so good
#1
Posted 2020-May-07, 01:17
I was wondering if you have noticed that N-S hands over a session has more points than E-W hands.
I have been playing Rubber Bridge for more than a month on BBO with few of my friends during this lockdown. I found that generally N-S get better hands.
Though BBO must be having some algorithm to balance the hands, however this is my and some of my friends observation too.
Please do share your observations on this topic.
Thanks
Sanjay Mohan
#2
Posted 2020-May-07, 01:54
#3
Posted 2020-May-07, 02:26
#4
Posted 2020-May-07, 02:36
If there is a bias, it was when playing at my local (physical) club. Averaged around 70% defending frequency over two years. Normally only declared 3-5 times on a 26 board evening. I compiled average HCP strength over all non-novice evenings (easy to do with BridgeWebs) over six months and found no bias in the hand strength by direction, but there was a small negative bias in my hand strength if I only included the hands on the evenings I played. This seemed to be related to a small bias against North and East on the evenings I played, which were the directions I tended to sit, and I noticed that runs of evenings with below average HCP were quite common. Another experienced player who always sits North told me his perception was a bias to picking up sub-par bridge hands.
We'll see what this evening brings.
#5
Posted 2020-May-07, 08:26
#6
Posted 2020-May-22, 03:19
#7
Posted 2020-May-25, 13:43
Making them even out in a single session would require cooking the hands.
#8
Posted 2020-May-25, 18:50
#9
Posted 2020-May-31, 13:59
Average East HCP
11.94
8.44
10
10.83
8.33
8.67
11.11
9.11
9.56
9.83
Six out of ten below average, mean 9.78.
For the sessions I was East:
8.44
10.83
8.67
9.11
Three out of four well below average, mean HCP 9.26. Even on the evening I had better than average hands, my partner copped the worst hands at the table (mean HCP 9.33)
Online bridge has started in a similar way to bridge at the real club. I often used to have evenings at the club when I wondered why I bothered turning up (pass pass pass follow suit follow suit BOTTOM, oh look, no-one else bid the game/slam), and I went home feeling crap rather than having an enjoyable evening. I keep telling myself next time will be better, and that is what I will continue to do whilst playing online. At least the number of boards is lower online so a really poor evening is over quicker.
I seem to have started online bridge at the time of a random poor hands streak. If the deals are fair, this should regress to the mean over the long term (i.e. I won't get a poor set of hands ever session, and a good streak will come up eventually). I will continue to monitor occasionally out of personal interest.
#11
Posted 2020-May-31, 14:32
AL78, on 2020-May-31, 13:59, said:
Six out of ten below average, mean 9.78.
So, you flipped a coin 10 times, and it came up heads 6 times...
Definitely suspicious...
#12
Posted 2020-May-31, 15:38
#13
Posted 2020-May-31, 15:48
hrothgar, on 2020-May-31, 14:32, said:
Definitely suspicious...
Wow, quoting one sentence out of context, I've never seen that before on an online forum.

You completely ignore what I said about the 10 board bias not being susbtantial and about not inferring much from small sample sizes just to try and imply I am jumping to conclusions about a hand bias. Please don't do this, I've seen it too many times, it is old and it is boring.
#15
Posted 2020-May-31, 16:34
#16
Posted 2020-May-31, 17:39
AL78, on 2020-May-31, 15:48, said:

You completely ignore what I said about the 10 board bias not being susbtantial and about not inferring much from small sample sizes just to try and imply I am jumping to conclusions about a hand bias. Please don't do this, I've seen it too many times, it is old and it is boring.
To be fair, you're posting in a thread which was complaining about hand bias, you directly said "there seems to be a bias against East", and "it is substantial if only the sessions I have played were counted". If the purpose of you posting was to demonstrate perfectly normal results and not in any way suggest bias, it was an odd way of going about it.
#17
Posted 2020-May-31, 22:01
"According to a meta-analysis of 144 studies, totaling 1,787,629 participants, the best estimate for the male to female odds ratio was 1.23, indicating 23% more men are left-handed. 11% of men and 9% of women would be approximately 10% overall, at a 1.22 male to female odds ratio.[69][clarification needed]"
This means that if you sit South then the person on the left is definitely at a disadvantage but only - as you will discover later in the same article - if they are a male or a kangaroo.
#19
Posted 2020-June-01, 09:01
AL78, on 2020-May-31, 13:59, said:
Does your club use predealt hands from The Common Game, as many clubs have been doing? If so, BBO has nothing to do with the way the hands were dealt.
If they're using BBO-generated hands, we've analyzed them many times and there's no bias.
#20
Posted 2020-June-01, 19:11
AL78, on 2020-May-31, 15:50, said:
I have tried to sit a different direction by registering and inviting, and alternately waiting for my p to register and invite. Ive even tried signing on to bbo first or last. Nothing changes the fact that I continue to be South. And I guarantee I am NOT getting the best hands! Was hoping to get on this part of the forum and find out how to predetermine my direction. Does anyone know???