Help
Page 1 of 1
Rebid problem
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,366
- Joined: 2013-August-03
- Gender:Female
- Location:Variable private
- Interests:Cricket,Photography,Paediatrics and Community Medicine.
Posted 2020-January-26, 23:43
BOARD 7.IMP scoring. what is the most descriptive bid? Would it be the same if it is MP scoring ?
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,103
- Joined: 2009-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:Kent (Near London)
Posted 2020-January-27, 01:48
Some might choose to pass this, but we play a weak NT and would have opened 1NT. Playing a strong NT, you presumably rebid 2NT to show the weak NT type hand.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,485
- Joined: 2009-July-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:London
Posted 2020-January-27, 02:24
I think the idea of opening 1NT when 4-5 in the majors is horrible!
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
London UK
#4
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,204
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
- Interests:History, languages
Posted 2020-January-27, 02:41
Playing SEF it is a systematic 2♥ rebid, maybe also playing SAYC in order to allow responder to bid a nonforcing 2NT.
Playing 2/1, 2NT or maybe even 2♠ may be an option, depending on style.
Playing Acol I would have opened 1NT.
I wouldn't blame partner for having passed, or opened 1♣, by the way. But I would probably open 1♥ myself.
Playing 2/1, 2NT or maybe even 2♠ may be an option, depending on style.
Playing Acol I would have opened 1NT.
I wouldn't blame partner for having passed, or opened 1♣, by the way. But I would probably open 1♥ myself.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,103
- Joined: 2009-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:Kent (Near London)
Posted 2020-January-27, 03:19
gordontd, on 2020-January-27, 02:24, said:
I think the idea of opening 1NT when 4-5 in the majors is horrible!
Yes, it is unpleasant. But I would argue that rebidding that heart suit is even more unpleasant and reversing is completely wrong. There is a lot to be said for passing on a hand that has defence but little playing strength.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,249
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2020-January-27, 03:43
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,366
- Joined: 2013-August-03
- Gender:Female
- Location:Variable private
- Interests:Cricket,Photography,Paediatrics and Community Medicine.
Posted 2020-January-27, 10:28
helene_t, on 2020-January-27, 02:41, said:
Playing SEF it is a systematic 2♥ rebid, maybe also playing SAYC in order to allow responder to bid a nonforcing 2NT.
Playing 2/1, 2NT or maybe even 2♠ may be an option, depending on style.
Playing Acol I would have opened 1NT.
I wouldn't blame partner for having passed, or opened 1♣, by the way. But I would probably open 1♥ myself.
Playing 2/1, 2NT or maybe even 2♠ may be an option, depending on style.
Playing Acol I would have opened 1NT.
I wouldn't blame partner for having passed, or opened 1♣, by the way. But I would probably open 1♥ myself.
Madam ,Thanks a lot.I presumed the same.
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,941
- Joined: 2014-February-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Italy
Posted 2020-January-27, 11:14
Tramticket, on 2020-January-27, 03:19, said:
Yes, it is unpleasant. But I would argue that rebidding that heart suit is even more unpleasant and reversing is completely wrong. There is a lot to be said for passing on a hand that has defence but little playing strength.
Reversing is the systemic bid here in our style of 2/1 with strong NT - but then pass was the systemic first call too (and if I really had to bid it would be 1C).
Page 1 of 1