BBO Discussion Forums: Negative double - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Negative double

Poll: Negative double (9 member(s) have cast votes)

1H-(3D)-x-p; ?

  1. 3H (NF) (5 votes [55.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 55.56%

  2. 3S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 3NT (2 votes [22.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

  4. 4D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 4H (2 votes [22.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2020-January-21, 04:51

IMPs, good opponents.

... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,058
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2020-January-21, 07:05

At this vulnerability in IMPs I want to be in game, and 4 looks a better bet than 3NT with these diamonds.
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2020-January-22, 09:01

The winning call here is 3NT but I am probably being influenced by the actual hand.

ATxxx
Qx
Tx
QJ9x

Double dummy you can always take 9 tricks (preemptor has Txx of clubs) and I think you have good chances in practice too.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users