What happened there?
#1
Posted 2019-September-19, 07:45
cost Italy 13 IMPs and a vital win against leaders USA1 in the Bermuda Bowl. A very surprising mishap by a team famed for precise slam bidding - almost any system (even stone age Blackwood and number of Kings) should lead straight to grand here.
I can only guess that 4NT was intended by Bocchi as RKCB but Sementa took it as Turbo - in any case not conceivable at this level.
#2
Posted 2019-September-19, 08:24
pescetom, on 2019-September-19, 07:45, said:
cost Italy 13 IMPs and a vital win against leaders USA1 in the Bermuda Bowl. A very surprising mishap by a team famed for precise slam bidding - almost any system (even stone age Blackwood and number of Kings) should lead straight to grand here.
I can only guess that 4NT was intended by Bocchi as RKCB but Sementa took it as Turbo - in any case not conceivable at this level.
Yes, not a good result. But England had their own slam mishap in the earlier rounds missing a 13 trick laydown grand against Indonesia. Board 19
https://www.bridgeba...ch.php?id=65554
#3
Posted 2019-September-19, 08:28
Missing it does look like an error though.
#4
Posted 2019-September-19, 09:09
FelicityR, on 2019-September-19, 08:24, said:
https://www.bridgeba...ch.php?id=65554
Not sure what Robson was worried about there, but maybe they have too wide NT ranges for East to bid this quantitatively.
#5
Posted 2019-September-19, 09:35
sfi, on 2019-September-19, 08:28, said:
Even the weakest players in our Friday night field are capable of:
1♠ 4NT
5♥ 5NT
6S 7NT
We would probably bid:
1♠ 2♣
2♦ 3♠
4♣ 4♥
5♦ 6♣
6♥ 7♠.
South knows the clubs situation and that we have all the keycards.
But any decent system should get there I think. Only a few countries failed to call 7♠.
#6
Posted 2019-September-19, 09:49
As I said, if South takes control it's obvious to bid. If not, there is a bit more work to do.
#7
Posted 2019-September-19, 09:58
sfi, on 2019-September-19, 09:49, said:
It looks like the weaker players are using old fashioned Blackwood, so 6♠ showed 3 kings and all the aces and kings are accounted for.
West appears to be triple-squeezed on the run of the spades, but would the weakest player find that?
#8
Posted 2019-September-19, 10:34
1♠ - 2N
3♣ - 3♥
6♠
#9
Posted 2019-September-19, 12:23
barmar, on 2019-September-19, 09:58, said:
West appears to be triple-squeezed on the run of the spades, but would the weakest player find that?
The weaker player does not know what a squeeze is
#10
Posted 2019-September-19, 12:32
sfi, on 2019-September-19, 09:49, said:
The weaker player doesn't have a clue, but that was the point - he would still call a grand, as would almost everyone at their own level.
sfi, on 2019-September-19, 09:49, said:
As I said, if South takes control it's obvious to bid. If not, there is a bit more work to do.
You didn't understand my auction entirely correctly. South knows North is either 5251 or (more likely) 5341 and more specifically
♠AKxxx ♥Kx(x) ♦AKxx(x) ♣x.
#11
Posted 2019-September-19, 14:11
#12
Posted 2019-September-20, 00:17
smerriman, on 2019-September-19, 14:11, said:
Give it some credit. It will happily bid grand slam in a 4-2 fit after you double then try to show a good one-suiter.
ahydra