BPO-002D
#41
Posted 2005-May-17, 12:49
xxxxx
xxx
void
xxxxx
Do you want to play in 1D or 4s or 5s?
#42
Posted 2005-May-17, 13:04
For the record I think 4♦ is bad and I prefer 2♥ to 4♣ but I bid something else so....
(You'll see soon)
#43
Posted 2005-May-17, 13:17
luis, on May 17 2005, 03:04 PM, said:
For the record I think 4♦ is bad and I prefer 2♥ to 4♣ but I bid something else so....
(You'll see soon)
Yes, luis came up with a creative choice on this one... and yes, it will not receive a high score, but it probably deserves a very high one... I will need to refelct upon it some more.
Ben
#44
Posted 2005-May-17, 14:09
luis, on May 17 2005, 10:04 PM, said:
For the record I think 4♦ is bad and I prefer 2♥ to 4♣
I'll repeat again that I consider 4♦ to be the only logical choice... If players aren't going to use a 4♦ rebid with this hand, then they should damn well reassign the meaning of the 4♦ rebid. I understand that some players are fixating on the fact that opener holds the AK of Hearts; fearing that responder won't be able to make a sensible rebid. However, this is (should be) a non-issue.
First and foremost, the 4♦ bidder could easily hold a a singleton or even a void in Hearts. In this case, a holding like xxxx in responder's hand is golden and not necessarily a detriment. Accordingly, responder's 4♥ advance should NOT show a Heart control. As I noted earlier, this bid should be used as Last train or something similar.. If you don't like the Last Train interpretation, than it must be better to ask via a Control Asking Bid rather than show...
The following type of response structure problable makes sense:
55♠ = trump quality ask type 2
5♥ = trump quality ask type 2
5♦ = Control asking bid in Hearts
5♣ = Control asking bid in Clubs
4NT = RKCB for Spades (Diamonds don't count)
4♠ = Signoff
4♥ = Last train
#45
Posted 2005-May-17, 14:54
#46
Posted 2005-May-17, 14:57
♠Q10xx
♥AKQJ109xx
♦AK
♣-
opened 1♥, partner answered 1♠, and since we didn't play exclusion I jsut bid 5NT, going 2 off to 6♥ when opponent found a singleton ♠ lead to teh Ace, King and a ruff. Still I think my 5NT bid was correct :-P.
#47
Posted 2005-May-17, 15:21
North held:
AJxx
AKQxxx
AKx
-
And south held:
KQTxxx
xx
xx
xxx
In the women tables the bidding was identical at both tables:
1♥ - pass - pass -pass
Making 7 No Swing!
In the men tables the bidding was identical at both tables:
1♥ - 1♠
5NT - 7♠
Making, No swing!
Interesting isn't it?
#48
Posted 2005-May-17, 15:24
#49
Posted 2005-May-17, 15:40
inquiry, on May 16 2005, 11:31 AM, said:
Here is a typical minimum for 4D
KQ85
7
AQJT84
63
#50
Posted 2005-May-17, 15:41
mike777, on May 18 2005, 12:40 AM, said:
inquiry, on May 16 2005, 11:31 AM, said:
|
| BPO-002D S----------W---------- N----------E 1♦…………..Pass…………1♠…….…..Pass ? your bid |
Here is a typical minimum for 4D
KQ85
7
AQJT84
63
4♦ explictly promises a solid Diamond suit...
#51
Posted 2005-May-17, 15:48
See Hardy, 2002.
#52
Posted 2005-May-17, 16:35
Here is a typical minimum for 4D
KQ85
7
AQJT84
63
Mike sorry, but you are WAY off beam with that hand as a 4D bid. Richard is 100% correct on this. The hand you post is a 3S bid.
#53
Posted 2005-May-17, 16:46
Would people rebid 4 diamonds with
♠ QTxx
♥ Ax
♦ AKQJxx
♣ x
?
BTW: I can't wait to see what Luis bid.
#54
Posted 2005-May-17, 16:50
Double !, on May 18 2005, 08:46 AM, said:
Would people rebid 4 diamonds with
♠ QTxx
♥ Ax
♦ AKQJxx
♣ x
?
BTW: I can't wait to see what Luis bid.
Yes, I would and suspect Richard would also.
#55
Posted 2005-May-17, 16:54
It's not only worth an extra trick, it's one less that the opps potentially could cash once we lose the lead (assuming a heart lead)
#56
Posted 2005-May-17, 16:56
The_Hog, on May 18 2005, 01:50 AM, said:
Double !, on May 18 2005, 08:46 AM, said:
Would people rebid 4 diamonds with
♠ QTxx
♥ Ax
♦ AKQJxx
♣ x
?
BTW: I can't wait to see what Luis bid.
Yes, I would and suspect Richard would also.
I'm SO predictable...
Yes, I'd bid 4♦ with this hand
For me, the important points to covey are:
1. 4 card spade support
2. 6-7 solid Diamonds
#57
Posted 2005-May-17, 17:01
#58
Posted 2005-May-17, 17:07
Quote
how so? i admit 4♦ didn't occur to me, though maybe it should have... what do the 4♦ bidders call over 4♠, assuming partner is on the same 'picture' wavelength? probably the same thing i'd bid after 4♣, which is 4nt, but maybe not
#59
Posted 2005-May-17, 17:13
I actually meant that I couldn't wait to find out what you bid with the initially given problem hand. I love creativity and find it very helpful.
#60
Posted 2005-May-17, 17:13
The HK is definitely not as important as showing the solid Ds - you have a source of tricks.
I would pass 4S as I fear 2 Spade losers. Over 4D, as Richard has already intimated, 4H would be Last Train.
A splinter is poor as it again does not emphasise the D suit.
BPO-002D
S----------W---------- N----------E
1♦…………..Pass…………1♠…….…..Pass
? your bid