Help
Add Reply
Side note, you should never truly be upset with your partner.
Enjoy
Would you be upset with partner or....
#21
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 2004-January-28
Posted 2019-September-11, 18:26
I think this is fine and grand is a bit rich.
Side note, you should never truly be upset with your partner.
Enjoy
Side note, you should never truly be upset with your partner.
Enjoy
Visit our website today at http://www.reginabridge.com for information on loads of conventions, our local club, and bridge hands.
MultiQuote
#22
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,366
- Joined: 2012-March-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Illinois
- Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer
Posted 2019-September-11, 22:23
I wouldn't worry too much about bidding grand on this hand. You should only bid grand if you can count 13 tricks or believe chance of making are something 67+%.
As for the bidding. I think 2 ♣ is fine, but would bid 2 ♦ even though responder's hand would just qualify for a positive minor response by my lights (5+ to 2 top honors and 2 QTs). It is an absolute minimum positive and takes up a lot of bidding space. It's often right for the weaker hand to get out of the way of the stronger hand and let the big hand tell its story.
After
2 ♣ - 2 ♦
2 ♠
My response as North would be 3 ♠ with ♠ xxxx as that's the strain we'll play in. Note we are a full level lower in identifying the fit than if 3 ♣ was the first response.
As for the bidding. I think 2 ♣ is fine, but would bid 2 ♦ even though responder's hand would just qualify for a positive minor response by my lights (5+ to 2 top honors and 2 QTs). It is an absolute minimum positive and takes up a lot of bidding space. It's often right for the weaker hand to get out of the way of the stronger hand and let the big hand tell its story.
After
2 ♣ - 2 ♦
2 ♠
My response as North would be 3 ♠ with ♠ xxxx as that's the strain we'll play in. Note we are a full level lower in identifying the fit than if 3 ♣ was the first response.
