BBO Discussion Forums: Law 19.8 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Law 19.8

#1 User is offline   shevek 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 707
  • Joined: 2006-September-29
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:whippets<br>anarchy<br>relay

Posted 2019-July-16, 05:04

It seems likely that England received the World Cup because

Kumar Dharmasena
Marais Erasmus
Rod Tucker &
Ranjan Madugalle

were unaware of Law 19.8

Discuss
0

#2 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2019-July-16, 05:29

 shevek, on 2019-July-16, 05:04, said:

It seems likely that England received the World Cup because

Kumar Dharmasena
Marais Erasmus
Rod Tucker &
Ranjan Madugalle

were unaware of Law 19.8

Discuss

And what is Law 19.8 ?
0

#3 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,048
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2019-July-16, 06:15

 pran, on 2019-July-16, 05:29, said:

And what is Law 19.8 ?


Rule 19.8: Overthrow or wilful act of fielder
If the boundary results from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs scored shall be

— any runs for penalties awarded to either side

— and the allowance for the boundary

— and the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act.
0

#4 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,613
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2019-July-16, 09:22

Why are we talking about cricket? (I had to google one of the names in the OP to find out what sport this was.)

#5 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2019-July-16, 11:01

 barmar, on 2019-July-16, 09:22, said:

Why are we talking about cricket? (I had to google one of the names in the OP to find out what sport this was.)

That makes two of us :P
0

#6 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,290
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2019-July-16, 11:21

 shevek, on 2019-July-16, 05:04, said:

It seems likely that England received the World Cup because

Kumar Dharmasena
Marais Erasmus
Rod Tucker &
Ranjan Madugalle

were unaware of Law 19.8

Discuss


Actually I think it was very unlikely it changed the result. My suspicion is that instead of premeditating to bunt the final pie bowled by Boult (and I don't think that would have changed, he went for a Yorker and missed it) for a single to try to ensure the tie and hope to run a second, whoever faced it would have hit it for 4 or 6 if they needed more than 1.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users