BBO Discussion Forums: Your bid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Your bid?

#21 User is offline   xbabarx 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 2015-July-11

Posted 2017-December-29, 16:06

Clubs void
0

#22 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2017-December-29, 16:29

I transposed responder's minors. Corrected above. Sorry to confuse.
Guthrie.tech
0

#23 User is offline   Joe_Old 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 171
  • Joined: 2016-December-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York, USA

Posted 2017-December-29, 16:52

 nige1, on 2017-December-29, 16:29, said:

I transposed responder's minors. Corrected above. Sorry to confuse.


np. In that case my idiot analysis stands.
0

#24 User is offline   P0STM0RTEM 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 2009-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Walsh Diamond;
    Rule of 20+2;
    Bergen or Hardy Raises;
    Kokish Game Tries;
    Xfer Lebensohl;
    Inverted Minors;
    Gambling 3N;
    Ogust;
    Mini Roman 2D;
    Puppet Stayman over 2N's;
    Modified 2-way, Bart & Meckstroth Adjuncts,
    Wolff Signoff;
    Preemptive Suit Fits Raises;
    Namyats;
    Controls over 2C opener;
    Kickback (RKCB 1430 if strong hand asks and 0314 if weak asks), Specific King Ask, Exclusion Blackwood, DEPO, and I try to cue bid controls more often instead;
    Grand Slam Force;
    Lightner Double;
    Negative and TakeOut Doubles;
    Meckwell, HELLO or DONT Over Ops 1N;
    Over 1C strong (or 1D strong) I like using DONT, Suction, or Mathe;
    UDCA.

Posted 2017-December-29, 21:35

Better than 4♥ I feel is the Fitted reply of 4♦ showing ♥ support enough for game with 4+ Good ♦s. There's hardly any room not taken up with this call and it allows opener to participate further over interference. This IMHO 'expert standard' treatment would of course require partnership agreement.
0

#25 User is offline   xbabarx 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 2015-July-11

Posted 2017-December-29, 23:36

 Joe_Old, on 2017-December-29, 16:52, said:

np. In that case my idiot analysis stands.

Haha I like your comments
0

#26 User is offline   xbabarx 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 2015-July-11

Posted 2017-December-29, 23:38

 P0STM0RTEM, on 2017-December-29, 21:35, said:

Better than 4♥ I feel is the Fitted reply of 4♦ showing ♥ support enough for game with 4+ Good ♦s. There's hardly any room not taken up with this call and it allows opener to participate further over interference. This IMHO 'expert standard' treatment would of course require partnership agreement.

Agree, expert partnership could reach maximum
0

#27 User is offline   xbabarx 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 2015-July-11

Posted 2017-December-29, 23:40

If one bid 5D, what it could be?
A new suit at 5 level? Control in Diamond? Exclusion (tell me key cards without Diamond suit)
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

11 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users