BBO Discussion Forums: Lead Problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lead Problem Does it depend on methods?

Poll: Lead Problem (16 member(s) have cast votes)

Your lead if 2NT shows four spades?

  1. Spade (6 votes [37.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.50%

  2. Heart (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  3. Diamond (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  4. Club (7 votes [43.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 43.75%

Your lead if 2NT may or may not have four spades?

  1. Spade (14 votes [87.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 87.50%

  2. Heart (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  3. Diamond (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Club (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

Your lead if 2NT denies holding a 4-card major?

  1. Spade (14 votes [87.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 87.50%

  2. Heart (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  3. Diamond (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Club (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,378
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2016-October-22, 12:21

An opening lead problem; matchpoint pairs:


Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#2 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2016-October-22, 14:57

♣
♠
♠
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#3 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,835
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-October-22, 17:47

2h

openers known suit and my longest, best suit.. not dummies.
0

#4 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,285
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2016-October-22, 18:40

spade, spade, spade. It's matchpoints. Let's not give anything away.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#5 User is offline   alok c 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 2015-February-25

Posted 2016-October-22, 23:42

♠-all.
0

#6 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2016-October-23, 01:06

awn poses "An opening lead problem; matchpoint pairs:"

I rank
If LHO promises 4♠s, then ♦, ♣, ♠. ♥.
if LHO might have 4♠s, then ♠, ♦, ♣, ♥.
If LHO denies 4 M, then ♠, ♦, ♣, ♥.

For many partnerships this sequence would deny 4♠s with LHO (whether or not opponents remember their agreement), so a ♠ lead seems safe and normal except when this sequence explicitly promises 4♠s.

Guthrie.tech
0

#7 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-October-23, 04:04

I'd lead J♦ on the first, which feels about as likely to give a trick away as a club and marginally more likely to hit an establishable five-card suit (given P couldn't double Stayman, which he might have scraped with Axxxx and something outside). Other than that, spade.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#8 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,672
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2016-October-23, 04:44

Spade on all three explanations.
0

#9 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,378
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2016-October-24, 22:52



At the end of the auction, North mentioned that there had been a failure to alert, and that 2NT did not guarantee a four-card major. After this, West lead ♣K face down on the table. East then asked if 2NT could ever include a four-card major, and North said that it could not. Of course, the club king lead was not a success.

It seems that there was some amount of misinformation here (there's a difference between 2NT "may or may not have four spades" vs. 2NT "denies four spades") but according to the poll here it does not much effect people's leads. The director was not called at the table; I'm curious what the ruling would've been.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users