BBO Discussion Forums: Minimum for a second in vul weak 2? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Minimum for a second in vul weak 2?

#1 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-October-05, 14:45

What's the worst hand you can construct that you think should open 2? Would it be any different (besides suit arrangement) for a weak 2/?
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#2 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2016-October-05, 16:01

View PostJinksy, on 2016-October-05, 14:45, said:

What's the worst hand you can construct that you think should open 2? Would it be any different (besides suit arrangement) for a weak 2/?


kqt9xx and out if balish
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2016-October-05, 16:12

View Postwank, on 2016-October-05, 16:01, said:

kqt9xx and out if balish


If balish means I have shortness (preferably 6421) then yes.

Preempts show length. They should have offense. They shouldn't have defense. 2nd seat is no exception.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   Kaitlyn S 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,092
  • Joined: 2016-July-31
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2016-October-05, 16:13

Matchpoints or IMPs? State of the match? Are the opponents also vulnerable?
0

#5 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2016-October-05, 16:16

View PostPhil, on 2016-October-05, 16:12, said:

If balish means I have shortness (preferably 6421) then yes.

Preempts show length. They should have offense. They shouldn't have defense. 2nd seat is no exception.


i meant something like kqt9xx xx xxx xx as in relatively balanced.

if i had extra shape, e.g. 6421 i would accept a weaker suit.
0

#6 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-October-06, 06:50

View Postwank, on 2016-October-05, 16:16, said:

i meant something like kqt9xx xx xxx xx as in relatively balanced.

if i had extra shape, e.g. 6421 i would accept a weaker suit.

Yeah, I might go as low as KJT9xx x xxxx xx. Maybe I would want the 8. It's close, this is about my limit. KQ98xx same story.

grumpy nitpick: I wish you would capitalize honor cards.


Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-October-06, 07:24

Next question - how do you view points outside the trump suit? As a net positive or negative, and how much so?

Eg on the cusp would you prefer a 'pure' hand, such as KQ987x xxx xx xx, or a hand with some outside values to get it 'up to strength', such as KQ987x xxx Kx xx? If the opened suit is substantially too weak, would you open anyway with decent outside values, and does it depend on the nature of the values? Eg
QJTxxx Axx xx xx
QJ98xx KJx Qx Jx
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#8 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2016-October-06, 07:29

aces and kings outside are good. queen and jacks aren't (unless in a side 4 card suit).
0

#9 User is online   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2016-October-06, 07:37

View Postbillw55, on 2016-October-06, 06:50, said:

grumpy nitpick: I wish you would capitalize honor cards.

Wank does not have a shift key on his keyboard which is why he does not capitalise the first letter of a sentence either nor the pronoun "I". But aces, kings, queens and jacks, should not be capitalized according to most publishing house styles. And deuces and treys have gone their own ways ... And KQJxxx and out for me. There they do need caps.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2016-October-06, 08:00

View Postwank, on 2016-October-06, 07:29, said:

aces and kings outside are good. queen and jacks aren't (unless in a side 4 card suit).


The 'perfect' preempt looks like KQJT98, so I'm not going to agree with 'aces are good'.

However, I would rather have one Ace than two queens for a preempt.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#11 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2016-October-06, 08:39

View PostPhil, on 2016-October-06, 08:00, said:

The 'perfect' preempt looks like KQJT98, so I'm not going to agree with 'aces are good'.

However, I would rather have one Ace than two queens for a preempt.


yes i'd rather have the hcp in my suit but for example qjtxxx xx xxx xx i wouldn't open but qjtxxx xx axx xx i would. i wouldn't open (by a large margin) qjtxxx xx qxx qx which is the same 7 hcp.
0

#12 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,454
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2016-October-06, 11:41

Aces and Kings outside are bad - partner won't know what to do later. One is good. Queens and jacks are waste paper, but also mean the opponents don't think they're as strong as they are, so they're more likely to leave it in and go for the plus - so they're actually a minus.

And for me KQ97xx or QJT9xx and a card seems right, one more notch in suit quality at strictly unfavourable.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#13 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-October-06, 12:09

View Postwank, on 2016-October-06, 07:29, said:

aces and kings outside are good. queen and jacks aren't (unless in a side 4 card suit).


Would you consider queens and jacks reasons *against* opening an otherwise marginal hand, or just neutral?
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#14 User is offline   Kaitlyn S 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,092
  • Joined: 2016-July-31
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2016-October-06, 12:39

View Postmycroft, on 2016-October-06, 11:41, said:

Queens and jacks are waste paper, but also mean the opponents don't think they're as strong as they are, so they're more likely to leave it in and go for the plus - so they're actually a minus.
On the other hand, a side queen is more likely to take a trick on defense once you've preempted, especially a doubleton queen.
0

#15 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2016-October-09, 09:26

A good solid suit if you have nothing outside --- KQJ10xx, AKJxxx, AQJxxx, etc.

A decent suit with a good additional value -- KQ10xxx, KJ10xxx with an A or guarded K.

Basically, a good "disciplined" 1st seat weak 2 is enough.

I learned many, many years ago that AQJxxx and out is enough even VUL. Partner showed up with a 20+ point max 1 bid. We missed a laydown slam in my suit because I couldn't convince partner that my suit was good enough without the 2nd seat weak 2.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users