Help
just want to know if it is allowed in bridge rule.
Page 1 of 1
Is this biding violate bridge rules? need help from experts
#1
- Group: Members
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 2003-February-22
- Gender:Male
Posted 2016-October-02, 11:40
good or bad of the bidding is not my concern.
just want to know if it is allowed in bridge rule.
just want to know if it is allowed in bridge rule.
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,168
- Joined: 2012-May-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
- Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge
Posted 2016-October-02, 12:36
No rule bars your choice. Judgment, maybe.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,251
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2016-October-02, 12:37
May depend where you are so you should state which jurisdiction, but in most places a canape 4-5 rule of 19 is fine.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,495
- Joined: 2003-February-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:Natick, MA
-
Interests:Travel
Cooking
Brewing
Hiking
Posted 2016-October-02, 13:26
It's perfectly legal under all of the regulatory structures that I am aware of.
[Many would require advanced disclosure if this opening was by agreement]
[Many would require advanced disclosure if this opening was by agreement]
Alderaan delenda est
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,866
- Joined: 2008-July-13
Posted 2016-October-02, 14:01
yes it's totally legal. you can normally bid anything you like. beginners often think other players must bid the same way they've been taught or it's cheating. it's not true.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,313
- Joined: 2014-April-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:Norway
- Interests:partscores
Posted 2016-October-02, 14:10
It's certainly legal to open 1♥ with this hand almost everywhere, but that doesn't mean that the 1♥ opening NS were playing had a non-HUM meaning like "8-15, 4+ H, possible canapé". Maybe it showed "0-10, any shape", which is HUM.
#7
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,205
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
- Interests:History, languages
Posted 2016-October-03, 04:38
A bid can never be illegal (well, almost never: opening 7NT without first looking at your cards would be illegal).
Having the agreement with partner to open 1♥ with that a hand like this could in theory be illegal in some jurisdictions, but I would be surprised if it is.
Having the agreement to open 1♥ with this hand and not taking any measures to inform the opponents about such an agreement (for example by alerting or by putting it on the front of the convention card) may well be against your local regulations. In any case, if opponents ask you if your partner's 1♥ opening promises that no other suit is longer than hearts, you must tell them the truth. You can't look at your partner's cards but you must be honest about what your agreements are.
If partner opens 1♥ on this hand which is against your agreements, he may fool both you and the opponents. That's ok. If he does it very often, though, you will eventually start expecting him to do it, and at that point it becomes an "implicit agreement" which you must inform the opponents about.
Having the agreement with partner to open 1♥ with that a hand like this could in theory be illegal in some jurisdictions, but I would be surprised if it is.
Having the agreement to open 1♥ with this hand and not taking any measures to inform the opponents about such an agreement (for example by alerting or by putting it on the front of the convention card) may well be against your local regulations. In any case, if opponents ask you if your partner's 1♥ opening promises that no other suit is longer than hearts, you must tell them the truth. You can't look at your partner's cards but you must be honest about what your agreements are.
If partner opens 1♥ on this hand which is against your agreements, he may fool both you and the opponents. That's ok. If he does it very often, though, you will eventually start expecting him to do it, and at that point it becomes an "implicit agreement" which you must inform the opponents about.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#8
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 2016-April-01
Posted 2016-October-05, 12:05
helene_t, on 2016-October-03, 04:38, said:
opening 7NT without first looking at your cards would be illegal.
Why?
I would love it, if opps ever did that.
I might even double without looking at my cards
#9
- Secretary Bird
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,457
- Joined: 2003-July-12
- Gender:Male
- Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16
Posted 2016-October-05, 14:34
Yes, but opening 1♠ without first looking at your cards is also illegal...
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
#10
- Group: Members
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 2003-February-22
- Gender:Male
Posted 2016-October-09, 12:01
reply to all:
I definitely have no agreement on this bidding since my partner is ROBOT.
the bidding was judged illegal by the director of an online bridge game site which has its own 'bridge rules'.
I definitely have no agreement on this bidding since my partner is ROBOT.
the bidding was judged illegal by the director of an online bridge game site which has its own 'bridge rules'.
Page 1 of 1