BBO Discussion Forums: Enough to overcall? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Enough to overcall?

#1 User is offline   diana_eva 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 5,004
  • Joined: 2009-July-26
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:bucharest / romania

Posted 2016-August-01, 07:53

IMPs. Would you bid?



#2 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,227
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2016-August-01, 09:05

I wouldn't at IMPs, I think it's closer at MPs. If we have game on partner will bid. Also if I pass in tempo, there is less need for W to barrage if he's thinking about it.
2

#3 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2016-August-01, 09:37

My partner probably would, and I'd moan at him afterwards for it :) We have an extremely low ODR, seems clear to pass.

ahydra
0

#4 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-August-01, 09:48

Clear pass.

We have no game and if lho is short in hearts our downside is either large enough in 2♠ or when partner bids/raises.

My passed hand partner is very good at balancing when appropriate.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#5 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2016-August-01, 13:52

Pass. I agree with ggwhiz. While you want to compete for part scores at IMPs, you have to temper it with the potential for a number when vulnerable. There are too many losers and honor cards that are only possible slow winners to bid. If you bid, you are dependent on partner having cards to fill in the holes to make anything -- never a good position to be in.

OTOH, if partner finds a way to reopen, you'll be well placed to make a bid.

If RHO opponent had passed, would you open this hand? I'd pass with no problem and expect at worst to find no more than a small swing either way. So I see no reason to compete now.
0

#6 User is offline   akwoo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,378
  • Joined: 2010-November-21

Posted 2016-August-01, 14:15

I would usually pass.

But I've played with partners with the bravery of a dead rabbit, and I've also played with partners who don't understand the difference between actions in direct seat and actions in balancing seat. In those cases, I bid, even at IMPs.
0

#7 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2016-August-01, 14:36

I wouldn't bid at imps. I wouldn't bid at pairs. I would only bid if opponents promise not to double and partner promise not to take my bid seriously.
Now if the vulnerability were reversed I might be willing to bid.
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2016-August-01, 19:51

I dont see this as a matter of "enough" as much as a matter of need and reason. Partner as a passed hand will balance enough where bidding 2S myself is not needed when it would be nice.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2016-August-01, 21:08

I'd pass.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#10 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2016-August-02, 00:34

I'll add my voice for pass
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
0

#11 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2016-August-02, 19:35

Pass - no second thought.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
0

#12 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2016-August-03, 01:45

I don't find it hard to construct hands for partner opposite which we would want to be in game, but I suppose that with most of them partner, having already passed, will re-open with a double.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#13 User is offline   cynac 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: 2016-February-16

Posted 2016-August-05, 17:55

Too disciplined by half, you guys....
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users