BBO Discussion Forums: a 3NT defence - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

a 3NT defence

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2016-April-17, 02:46



Partner leads ♦3 (3rd/5th) which could be Qxx, 10xx or even xxx.

Assume declarer is going to play a heart to the jack, what is the best defence?

You can test it here: http://bridgegod.com...id=157&setid=21
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#2 User is offline   alok c 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 2015-February-25

Posted 2016-April-17, 08:20

CQ.
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2016-April-17, 08:36

I played ♦J at trick one, and declarer incorrectly won with the queen. He should have won with the ace, to give me the option of playing him for AKxx Qxx Axx Kxx
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2016-April-17, 09:58

View Postgnasher, on 2016-April-17, 08:36, said:

I played ♦J at trick one, and declarer incorrectly won with the queen. He should have won with the ace, to give me the option of playing him for AKxx Qxx Axx Kxx

And you would then score 2♦, 1♥, 1♠, 1♣ and defeat him.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2016-April-17, 14:38

View PostFluffy, on 2016-April-17, 09:58, said:

And you would then score 2♦, 1♥, 1♠, 1♣ and defeat him.

Oh, does that add up to five? Sorry
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2016-April-18, 09:32

Why do you assume declarer will play a heart to the jack? If declarer has Axxx Qxx AQT Kxx then this is misère play and he needs to play on spades first, when there is no defence, as the winning opening lead (a heart or a club) has not been found. If your partner has the ten of diamonds, then any old defence will work (whenever it can be beaten), and I would just continue diamonds.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#7 User is offline   alok c 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 2015-February-25

Posted 2016-April-18, 21:53

View Postlamford, on 2016-April-18, 09:32, said:

Why do you assume declarer will play a heart to the jack? If declarer has Axxx Qxx AQT Kxx then this is misère play and he needs to play on spades first, when there is no defence, as the winning opening lead (a heart or a club) has not been found. If your partner has the ten of diamonds, then any old defence will work (whenever it can be beaten), and I would just continue diamonds.

If West tackles spade first,still the contract will be defeated if North switches to Club upon entry.
0

#8 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2016-April-18, 23:45

View Postalok c, on 2016-April-18, 21:53, said:

If West tackles spade first,still the contract will be defeated if North switches to Club upon entry.


not entirely true. cashing all the diamonds and spades squeezes south. you can them throw him in on a club for a heart in the aj.
1

#9 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2016-April-19, 16:15

On reflection, I think that it's right to switch to a low club, catering for declarer's AKxx Qx AQx 8xxx. On the first round of hearts partner played ♥2, which ought to be suit-preference.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#10 User is offline   alok c 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 2015-February-25

Posted 2016-April-27, 23:52

View Postgnasher, on 2016-April-19, 16:15, said:

On reflection, I think that it's right to switch to a low club, catering for declarer's AKxx Qx AQx 8xxx. On the first round of hearts partner played ♥2, which ought to be suit-preference.

After QC lead by South 4 tricks are assured in his hand as long West hold CKxx,any entry in North's hand will defeat the contract.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users