when do you pull the double of 1NT -doubled
#1
Posted 2015-October-26, 06:32
I am looking for some general guidelines where the Opponent has opened 1NT (15-17) and Partner has doubled for penalty in the direct seat . What are the circumstances where you might pull the double and how/if those guidelines might be modified depending upon whether the Opening bidder is in 1st,2nd,3rd,or 4th seat ?
I am strictly interested in Matchpoint bidding....Thanks for any response
#2
Posted 2015-October-26, 06:55
In 3rdseat maybe we should pull less often because the1ntopening might be a psych.
But generally I pull with 0-3 points and a five card suit.
#3
Posted 2015-October-26, 07:08
#4
Posted 2015-October-26, 07:50
If partner has not passed, doubles directly, and this is agreed for penalty, then you should pull only with a very weak hand and long suit. i.e. hand where you really think 1NTx is going to make, and you have a safe(ish) escape.
-gwnn
#5
Posted 2015-October-26, 09:44
Nothing worse than running to 2♠ to find partner with the goods in a lower suit.
Balancing doubles of 1nt including past hands show 11+ balanced that wants to scramble into a playable spot and only from the passout seat.
What is baby oil made of?
#6
Posted 2015-October-26, 10:41
1 NTx making is usually a bad result at MPs. But without a hand that yields a better landing place, you may just find it better to take your "bad" result rather than run to a worse result. If you're looking at something like xxx xxx xxxx xxx, anything you do might get you in more trouble.
If you hold K10xxx xxx xxx xx, then 2 ♠ looks better than 1 NTx, so run if possible.
Another thing to remember is that partner may be doubling on a holding that may not have as many HCP but has a chance to beat 1 NT no matter what you hold -- something like xx AKQJxxx xx xx or xx Axx Ax KQJ10xx.
#7
Posted 2015-October-26, 11:14
#8
Posted 2015-October-27, 07:02
We found that the doubler just got frustrated when partner yanked, so we just agreed to 'always sit'. This is isn't perfect to be sure, but it does smooth out the partnership aspect.
#10
Posted 2015-October-27, 08:35
Shugart23, on 2015-October-26, 11:14, said:
I believe you are correct but coming in profitably is important. We pass the good but unsuitable hands and you should see some of the crap we balance on in pass out seat.
What is baby oil made of?
#11
Posted 2015-October-27, 09:09
#12
Posted 2015-October-27, 11:24
ggwhiz, on 2015-October-26, 09:44, said:
Nothing worse than running to 2♠ to find partner with the goods in a lower suit.
Balancing doubles of 1nt including past hands show 11+ balanced that wants to scramble into a playable spot and only from the passout seat.
Balancing with 11+ balanced points against a strong NT is utter nonsense. The NT bidder's partners knows his partner's hand and will often know exactly what to do. You will do much better passing and defending.
#13
Posted 2015-October-27, 12:08
The constraint is oriented toward you South or North being doubled, but you can just as easily sit East or West and see the pattern of success unfold or perhaps the reverse. 8-)
Charles A. Lee
Left2Right on BBO
#14
Posted 2015-October-27, 13:09
iandayre, on 2015-October-27, 11:24, said:
The OP is of the opinion that defending a white 1nt at MATCHPOINTS is a losing proposition and I agree. Unless we're red I'll take my lumps and win the board more often than not. I agree with you at imps though.
What is baby oil made of?
#15
Posted 2015-October-27, 20:35
If I have a bad unbalanced hand I will pull with 6-card suit or with chunky 5-card suit and side singleton.
If I have a good unbalanced hand and I think we have reasonable chance for game I can cue-bid 2NT which partner will assume is bad hand with both minors but I will do something inconsistent with that later.
#16
Posted 2015-October-28, 02:01