Page 1 of 1
Minor 2-suiter Bidding problem
#3
Posted 2015-July-13, 17:03
In this day and age, double has acquired the meaning, in many sequences, of 'I have more strength than you expect on the bidding so far, I lack a big fit for you, and am uncertain as to whether we should be declaring or defending, but I can't pass it to you'
Partner won't/shouldn't expect a trump stack and he is expected to pull with extra shape or with a fit and significant extras.
He will pass with a moderate hand with 5 spades and fewer than 4 diamonds. He may also pass with some useful clubs for us so we may end up with 300 or 500 against our 600/620/1370.
However, he may hold AJxxx xx xxx xxx, and bidding would turn +300 or so into -100 or so, and that is a lot of imps.
I think the flexible double is the correct call with a good partner. It is also the correct call with a poor partner, but is more inclined to work out poorly.
Partner won't/shouldn't expect a trump stack and he is expected to pull with extra shape or with a fit and significant extras.
He will pass with a moderate hand with 5 spades and fewer than 4 diamonds. He may also pass with some useful clubs for us so we may end up with 300 or 500 against our 600/620/1370.
However, he may hold AJxxx xx xxx xxx, and bidding would turn +300 or so into -100 or so, and that is a lot of imps.
I think the flexible double is the correct call with a good partner. It is also the correct call with a poor partner, but is more inclined to work out poorly.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
Page 1 of 1
Teams. IMPs. VPs.
Both sides playing no-frills Acol.