[thorvald]

I was looking the the BBO-advanced FD-file, and noticed the following lines

001N2C{NOT FOR MAJORS}2D{NOT FOR MAJORS}=NYYYYYYA08Jacoby transfer, 5+!hs

and a little later in the file

001N2C{LANDY - FOR MAJORS}2D{LANDY - FOR MAJORS}=NYYYYYYA08Jacoby transfer, 5+!hs

Ignoring the fact it is strange playing transfer after 1NT-(2♣) showing boths majors, it could look like we should be able to define the same bid with different meanings based on some kind of explanation marked with {}, but I have no idea about how that information can be provided to FD when the bid should be explained - Anyone got any ideas ?

Thorvald

[steve2005]

thorvald, on 2015-July-03, 16:02, said:

Ignoring the fact it is strange playing transfer after 1NT-(2♣) showing boths majors,
Thorvald

not to turn this into a bidding question but...

2♣ is often 5-4 some even 4-4 so our side can have majority of a major suit. Also this may be a prelude to bidding out shape by offering NT or a second suit.

[thorvald]

steve2005, on 2015-July-05, 19:45, said:

not to turn this into a bidding question but...

2♣ is often 5-4 some even 4-4 so our side can have majority of a major suit. Also this may be a prelude to bidding out shape by offering NT or a second suit.

I am much more interested in the syntax, than the actual bidding - Nobody knows what the intentions of this was ?
Thorvald