Sitting South in Robot tournament, I dealt and opened:
1C 2C P 3C alerted as 3+ 3+ in Majors.
E. GIB actually had hearts and spade void (V,AKQ7,Q10987642,6)
Believing this alert, I pulled N GIB's penalty double of W Gib's 4S bid.
LOL, obviously W GIB believed E also!
Page 1 of 1
Incorrect GIB explanation of Michaels Advance 1C 2C P 3C alerted as 3+ 3+ in Majors. GIB had hearts and spade void
#2
Posted 2015-February-23, 22:24
If 2♣ shows 12+ total points and 3♣ shows 14+ total points with a double fit, why is 3♣ only forcing to 3♥?
It's also strange that 5♥ is described as a cue bid and West passes it.
#3
Posted 2015-February-24, 05:37
Bbradley62, on 2015-February-23, 22:24, said:
If 2♣ shows 12+ total points and 3♣ shows 14+ total points with a double fit, why is 3♣ only forcing to 3♥?
It's also strange that 5♥ is described as a cue bid and West passes it.
I never think the explanations of Gib are incorrect.
1- I think the key problem is definition of 3♣,according to Gib CC,cuebid 3♣ promises 3+♥ and 3+♠,so 3♣ for this hand is not a inapropriate bid since voidness in ♠.
2-
Quote
why is 3♣ only forcing to 3♥?
If you think "forcing to 3♥" is a good option,how to signoff 3♥? so here,no problem.
3-
Quote
It's also strange that 5♥ is described as a cue bid and West passes it.
Please take care of mediesel's bidding !
At first,mediesel cuebid have promised 3+♥ and 3+♠,then after ♠ trump confirmed by Gib W,5♥ is also a cuebid with 3+card support for sure,pass should be a playable option.
#4
Posted 2015-February-25, 07:25
Fixed 3♣ call for next version not to mislead about lengths ( i.e. using with just one of them ).
However will be addressed about possibility to be general GF and partner to differentiate his strength over such forcing.
However will be addressed about possibility to be general GF and partner to differentiate his strength over such forcing.
Page 1 of 1