blue for boys pink for girls
#1
Posted 2015-February-10, 02:11
When I ..somewhat tentatively,I am a very new member, protested, I was met with hostility by the mother who was proposing this (she has two daughters) who said something like although she herself didn't care, some people didn't appreciate such modern notions. When I suggested that was true but perhaps as a library, we ought not to be fostering archaic ones, they decided not to do a kids basket at all, but one for women with bubble bath and ornamental stuff to go in gardens, and golf stuff and fishing rods for the men. It just all seems so silly and a little depressing. I had to laugh quietly to myself because yesterday I learned that there is a huge fan club of adult men who are ardent fans of "my little pony".
I've been here ten years and the place still astonishes me with how much it's still in a time warp from the 1950s. Hopefully it's not representative of what's going on out there in the wider world.
#2
Posted 2015-February-10, 02:19
#3
Posted 2015-February-10, 02:32
I think the gendered gift giving was well handled by Obama in a similar situation to what you had.
#4
Posted 2015-February-10, 03:45
I was amused to see one of my girls getting all feminist when at some point a little boy held the door open and allowed my twin girls to pass through before him. On of the twins threw him a surprised glance, then decided to pass and as we were getting by him she told me loud enough so he can hear "You know I am a lot stronger than him, I can hold the door myself". My other girl was not bothered at all to get princess treatment, quite on the contrary, she was quick to add "What a nice little boy, how polite of him to hold the door for us".
#5
Posted 2015-February-10, 08:01
After age 11 we did indeed segregate. Some of this was practical. Although one of the best athletes in my 8th rgade class (when I was 12/13) was a girl, on balance having boys and girls playing football together was not a good idea. And then yes, I took "shop" while the girls took "home ec". There were assigned roles.
As for toys. I go easy and let the child lead. For my granddaughter's first birthday (the now 22 year old) I bought her a doll and a ball. She went fot the doll, ignored the ball. When my grandson was maybe 2, the now 15 year old, he could spot a truck, say one that was engaged in some truck-like activity, blocks away and insist that we go snd watch. I bough him a video, I dig dirt, and it was a big hit.Some of these preferences may welll be responding to social cues, but I do not believe that they all are. My younger daugher loved snakes. At the age of 7 or 8 she would go into the woods and bring back a snake, at times quite a large one. I am pretty sure that I never gave her any social cues that inspired this.
Somehow it seems to me that the problem at the library could have been solved. If there was to be a bou winnner and a girl winner, collect a lot of proze stuff and put it on the table. Flip a coin to see who gets first choice and them alternate. Or maybe one person chooses first, then the other person chooses second and third (first in the second round) and so on.
Bottom line: If a girl likes dolls and a boy likes trucks, let them And if a boy likes dolls and a girl likes trucks, let them.
#6
Posted 2015-February-10, 09:31
onoway, on 2015-February-10, 02:11, said:
Are these people really into the promotion of reading? Give books for prizes!
Most books are for both sexes no matter how old fashioned you thinking is.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#7
Posted 2015-February-10, 09:33
kenberg, on 2015-February-10, 08:01, said:
This!
Let children play.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#8
Posted 2015-February-10, 09:46
i mean you can get a kindle for like $40 or something.
or surely there is some modern equivalent to goosebumps that kids are reading now.
bed
#9
Posted 2015-February-10, 10:44
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2015-February-10, 14:06
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#11
Posted 2015-February-10, 16:25
kenberg, on 2015-February-10, 08:01, said:
I think I've read about a number of studies that have reproduced this. No matter how much the parents might try to get the kids interested in activities that are traditionally associated with the opposite gender, they generally tend towards the traditional types of toys. Girls generally like playing with baby dolls and playing house, boys generally like trucks and construction toys (e.g. Legos and Erector Sets).
As politically incorrect as it is to say it, there really are differences in the brains of men and women. Probably not in levels of intelligence, but in aspects that affect interests and behavior. In all primates, females have been the primary caregivers of children, so evolution naturally predisposed them to enjoy activities related to this. And childhood play is basically just "practicing" activities that will become real later in life.
#12
Posted 2015-February-10, 17:18
#13
Posted 2015-February-10, 17:23
barmar, on 2015-February-10, 16:25, said:
Other physical differences too.
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
#14
Posted 2015-February-10, 17:49
At some point she asked me who built this palace, I answered, the prince of the region about 200 years ago
She: I think the princess did it!
Me: why?
Because its pink!
Oouch
#15
Posted 2015-February-10, 22:36
Not sure why your library group needed you to get seed, which color was the seed?
"The idea had been that there would be a gift basket for the kids and one for the adults, that they would be selling tickets on. Tonight one of the board members"
Also if they are "gift baskets" are they not a gift and not to be sold?
"Tonight one of the board members announced that it was just too hard to find things that were non gendered so we had to have one for boys"
In any event why not gift books from a library group? Blue for boys and pink for girls?
A very confusing library group.
#16
Posted 2015-February-10, 23:31
mike777, on 2015-February-10, 22:36, said:
I remember that my grandmother found these color assignments very disturbing, having grown up with the opposite arrangement...
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
#17
Posted 2015-February-10, 23:45
I do notice my old Hardy boys books at times have a hint of pink on the cover
Also if we are looking at gifting books I vote for A Wrinkle in Time for both boys and girls and for older kids perhaps To Kill A Mockingbird.
I've been here ten years and the place still astonishes me with how much it's still in a time warp from the 1950s
#18
Posted 2015-February-11, 07:43
#19
Posted 2015-February-11, 11:17
Bbradley62, on 2015-February-11, 07:43, said:
I've tried to buy green or yellow clothes for new-born babies of friends and they seem not to exist. I suspect that most parents want there to be a way of avoiding others guessing wrong or having to ask.
London UK