BBO Discussion Forums: NT anyone? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

NT anyone?

#1 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-August-19, 13:42

I guess you can't expect much with a program that can't lead an Ace against 7NT but I'll make the point anyway.

GIB N held KJ52, A9, KT94, T96. 1D by E, 2C by S, P, and it cuebid 2D. OK, then P and partner bid 2H, natural and forward-going. The only question now is whether to bid 2NT or 3NT, isn't that right? The nullo continuation of 3C is laughable.

Quite honestly I'd prefer it to bid 2NT the first round.
0

#2 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-August-19, 17:47

View Postiandayre, on 2014-August-19, 13:42, said:

GIB N held KJ52, A9, KT94, T96. 1S by E, 2H by S, P, and it cuebid 2D. OK, then P and partner bid 2H, natural and forward-going. The only question now is whether to bid 2NT or 3NT, isn't that right? The nullo continuation of 3C is laughable.

I've never seen GIB make an insufficient bid.
0

#3 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-August-19, 22:25


0

#4 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-August-20, 13:31

View PostBbradley62, on 2014-August-19, 17:47, said:

I've never seen GIB make an insufficient bid.

Thanks, corrected overcall to 2C from 2H
0

#5 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-August-20, 15:13

And the opening bid was 1♦, not 1♠, which is what made 2♦ a cuebid.
0

#6 User is offline   iandayre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Joined: 2013-December-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-August-21, 10:29

View PostBbradley62, on 2014-August-20, 15:13, said:

And the opening bid was 1♦, not 1♠, which is what made 2♦ a cuebid.


All true, sorry, now corrected.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users