[lycier]

---

Gib psychic bid twice,this is a bug.

[Bbradley62]

That's pretty funny. You lost that game of poker

PS: I do think the double of 4♦ should be more clearly defined as penalty.

[lycier]

No,you don't know what I said,look at the hand above:
What's 2♠? what's 3♠?both explanations are 3-card ♦,but actually Gib W have singleton in ♦.

[lycier]

Bbradley62, on 2014-August-09, 07:44, said:

That's pretty funny. You lost that game of poker

PS: I do think the double of 4♦ should be more clearly defined as penalty.

What's poker?
Why do you say such?
If I don't double,how to show Gib psyhic bid or bug?
It's really a satire.

[steve2005]

my wife plays more robots than do I and she's been having problems with Gib pulling clear penalty doubles, I woulld be interested to know what a double of 4♦ would mean. it looks looks its going for a million but Gib has been known to pull juicy pen X.

[Bbradley62]

steve2005, on 2014-August-09, 20:35, said:

... I woulld be interested to know what a double of 4♦ would mean...

North did double 4♦. The explanation makes it look like a general values-showing double, and it's not showing anything more than North's double of 3♦ showed.

[steve2005]

Bbradley62, on 2014-August-09, 22:23, said:

North did double 4♦. The explanation makes it look like a general values-showing double, and it's not showing anything more than North's double of 3♦ showed.

oops didn't see the scroll button

[georgi]

Thanks for reporting.

This bug is fixed in v31.

It covers all pseudo-fits ( caused by this bug ) where 1M p 1N 2overcall is cue-fit from partner as here.

There were similar tickets where GIB cuebid opened major using 2♥/2♠ to impose on fit in partner's suit.

[steve2005]

Bbradley62, on 2014-August-09, 07:44, said:

PS: I do think the double of 4♦ should be more clearly defined as penalty.

Been thinking about this. Playing with a human if I double 3♦ and p pulls and opp bid 4♦

if I double now it doesn't show the same hand as 3♦X. Ive been warned I shouldn't double. to double 4♦ I have to be sure it's going down and probably with trump tricks.

4♦X shouldn't be the same explanation as 3♦ it should show ♦.