neilkaz, on 2014-April-21, 22:53, said:
Considering that 2♦ promised at least a King, 3♠ should promise something extra in terms of playing strength.
This is why I hate the 4♠ bid like everyone else. If I was forced to make only 1 bid after 3♠ and that bid had to end the auction I'd just bid 6♠.
This is why I hate the 4♠ bid like everyone else. If I was forced to make only 1 bid after 3♠ and that bid had to end the auction I'd just bid 6♠.
I can follow the argument, but sometimes it is important to know, where the king is,
not only that there is one, 3S would give room to find out where the king is located.
But this is certainly something, that the partnership needs to discuss.
With kind regards
Marlowe