BBO Discussion Forums: Please explain the new honor notation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Please explain the new honor notation

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-March-15, 19:39

With GIB v29, the 8421 method of identifying honors in cuebidding sequences has been replaced by something else. Can you please document this new method? In the hand below, the 3♦ bid is explained as showing ♦KQ. Does it mean KQ or A? What do other combinations mean?


0

#2 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-March-15, 22:21

I think it's the same method but a more human-friendly explanation. You can understand what's going on by converting it to 8421 in your head. In your example, GIB wanted to say 6+ in 8421 and holds 8.
I've already posted in the feedback thread about how I think this does more harm than good, currently. It should at least say something like "A or KQ or better".
0

#3 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,581
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-March-17, 11:52

There's an implicit "or better" in all these explanations. Saying that would make for long explanations, but maybe we could add "+".

#4 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-March-17, 23:39

Is it obvious that an Ace is better than KQJ?
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users