Into the valley of death rode the 600
#1
Posted 2014-March-01, 10:41
I think that most anyone would agree that there's been a Russian supported coup.
I hope that the government of Ukraine is intelligent enough to let this one go.
It's almost unimaginable that the Russian government would give up Sevastopol and this isn't a conflict that the Ukraine can win.
Equally important, Putin's naked power grab is almost certainly going to come back to haunt him.
* I can't imagine anyone going along with his free trade zone after this type of incident
* Moreover, he just pissed away his 50 billion dollar coming out party in Sochi.
I would think that the best option for the Ukraine is to launch furious diplomatic protests, while using this to try to unify the Western half of the country with the rump Russians left in Ukraine.
In the mean time, the Russians get to keep their port, but they inherit an economic basket case.
I think that all the significant risks for the Ukraine involve getting provoked into a military conflict
Let's hope that this doesn't happen
#2
Posted 2014-March-01, 10:48
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists that is why they invented hell. Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 2014-March-01, 12:06
#4
Posted 2014-March-01, 12:08
32519, on 2014-March-01, 12:06, said:
So you are saying that a war would be a good thing, then?
#5
Posted 2014-March-01, 16:20
#6
Posted 2014-March-01, 21:24
The western response to this conflict will probably be the same as to what happened in Georgia some years ago...
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#7
Posted 2014-March-02, 00:15
Aberlour10, on 2014-March-01, 16:20, said:
Russian was never an official language in Ukraine, since it became independent
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
#8
Posted 2014-March-02, 00:42
I await to see European response.
Guys this is a military conflict. It is there now.
I am a bit surprised to see an European country defend itself is such a mild fashion compared to Asian countries but it is early. OTOH the world the entire world has known this scenario for years and years.
#9
Posted 2014-March-02, 00:43
hrothgar, on 2014-March-01, 12:08, said:
War is never a good thing. The problem is nations like the USA who always seem to be meddling in the conflict of others. If that happens here, war is certainly possible.
#10
Posted 2014-March-02, 00:57
32519, on 2014-March-02, 00:43, said:
I think you raised the most important point.
In any event it will be interesting if they raise up against fascists and they did in Asia
It will be interesting to see European response to an invasion in the heart of Europe. neither west or east.
I hope you accept that there are worse things then war if not ok...
I agree the usa meddling in the conflicts of others....often...very often.
#11
Posted 2014-March-02, 02:13
andrei, on 2014-March-02, 00:15, said:
Official at the regional level
Quote
#12
Posted 2014-March-02, 08:41
#13
Posted 2014-March-02, 12:06
Maybe the Russians will attempt to hold a corridor wide and long enough to allow them to import food, water and electricity into the Crimea for the long run, but that sounds like an expensive proposition.
In addition, many Crimean residents, including the Tatars, are Muslim, which has implications throughout several areas in Russia, as well as causing potential problems with Turkey and other Muslim states.
Unfortunately, most of Europe needs Russian natural gas, so it seems unlikely that those countries can exert much pressure on Putin, and the USA has virtually no leverage at all.
The Ukraine can't win a shooting war but that doesn't mean there won't be one. Many countries have, historically, refused to back down in the face of horrendous odds but even more horrendous provocation.
#14
Posted 2014-March-03, 11:40
Having said that, sometimes black humour is the only humour you got...
hrothgar, on 2014-March-01, 10:41, said:
Seriously though, if the G7 choose to blow off the G8 meeting (rather than just the pre-meeting conversations), it might get interesting. If the G7 choose to have their own meeting Somewhere Else, it might get more interesting.
#15
Posted 2014-March-03, 12:09
At the right price, the rest of the Ukraine could do well and the U.S. has never had a problem with a non-contiguous border by staying on friendly terms with the guys in-between.
The ham handed tactics they chose instead are sooo unnecessary on so many different levels.
What is baby oil made of?
#16
Posted 2014-March-04, 16:00
These people have a police power at the streets of Kiev now
And its not Putin's propaganda but the report of BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/n...europe-26394980
#18
Posted 2014-March-05, 04:56
#19
Posted 2014-March-06, 03:07
helene_t, on 2014-March-05, 04:56, said:
"Don't listen to Obama's Ukraine critics: he's not 'losing' and it's not his fight"
I agree that Obama has not repeat not made clear what America's national interest is in this fight. That is the point.
As the headline states if Obama does not show leadership and make clear what Americas national interest is....to QUOTE " it's not his fight"
#20
Posted 2014-March-06, 08:06
helene_t, on 2014-March-05, 04:56, said:
Yeah, but it's so much fun to continue to fight the cold war.