BBO Discussion Forums: Bidding Cold Slams - 2 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bidding Cold Slams - 2

#1 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-February-28, 06:47



North dealer; Matchpoints.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

#2 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,705
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2014-February-28, 08:04

The opening hand looks a lot like 24-25hcp to me. An upgrade to 25 would probably get almost everyone there, so better to look at treating the hand as 24. This auction is not perfect but would work:

1 = 15+ nat/bal or 18+ any
... - 1 = (almost) any non-GF
1 = 18-20 any or 23+ bal
... - 1 = relay
2NT = 23-24 bal
... - 3 = 5+ hearts
3 = most hands
... - 3 = cog(3NT/4); or 4+ clubs; or strong slam interest with 6+ hearts
4 = 3 hearts and 4+ clubs
... - 4 = slam try
5 = accept slam try, 2 or 5 key cards () without Q
... - 6

The real answer on this hand is to play the "flags" system of superaccepts, where North would bid 4 over the transfer to show a control-rich hand with 3 hearts and a very strong club suit. After that it is really easy because South can see that the Q is working overtime. I have not incorporated that into my system as yet although I believe there are some BBF posters that play variants of the idea.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#3 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2014-February-28, 09:00

View PostZelandakh, on 2014-February-28, 08:04, said:

The opening hand looks a lot like 24-25hcp to me. An upgrade to 25 would probably get almost everyone there, so better to look at treating the hand as 24. This auction is not perfect but would work:

The real answer on this hand is to play the "flags" system of superaccepts, where North would bid 4 over the transfer to show a control-rich hand with 3 hearts and a very strong club suit. After that it is really easy because South can see that the Q is working overtime. I have not incorporated that into my system as yet although I believe there are some BBF posters that play variants of the idea.


Yes, 2C - 2D - 2NT (say) - 3D (game forcing transfer) - 4C (3 hearts, 5 clubs) etc
Getting to 6NT at matchpoints would be good biding.
0

#4 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-February-28, 10:01

If playing Kokish, I agree with the general idea of both responses but would have upgraded the opening hand:

2-2(GF)

2(Relay)-2(forced)

2NT(24+ equivalent)-3(transfer)

4(super-accept of hearts; if I had opened 1 I would have been able to cue clubs)...




FWIW, my own "definition" of the 4 super-accept might be explained better. When you open a balanced 1NT, 2NT, or higher, you have lost the nuance of having been able to open a minor first. The parallel auctions of, say, 1 (natural) opening, hearts agreed, and then cuebids allow you to show that your suit (clubs) is good. When I open the notrump call and then cuebid, as in this sequence, the auction becomes parallel to:

1(natural)-1(GF waiting)

2NT(24+)-3(transfer)

4(two of the top three clubs)

Thus, I am not just cuebidding but also indicating which minor I would have opened with a different structure/range.


"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users