North (Dealer)
S Q4
H ----
D KQ109
C AKQJ1082
South
S AK5
H J10762
D AJ8
C 65
Page 1 of 1
How would you bid?
#2
Posted 2014-February-14, 21:59
YOU CAN debate 2c or one club
If 2clubs perhaps:
2c=2d
3c=3h
4c=5nt?
3c=long clubs 3 loser hand
now south knows...grand is very very close.
at this point to keep it simple south might bid 5nt as grand slam force.
I fully grant this is a rather simple approach.
If 2clubs perhaps:
2c=2d
3c=3h
4c=5nt?
3c=long clubs 3 loser hand
now south knows...grand is very very close.
at this point to keep it simple south might bid 5nt as grand slam force.
I fully grant this is a rather simple approach.
#5
Posted 2014-February-14, 22:48
For me, this is just short of a 2♣ opening.
This would mean the bidding goes
1♣ - 1♥
2♦ - 2♠/2N(*)
3♣ - 3N
4♣ - 4♠(**)
5♥(***) - 7♣
The 7♣ bid is a bit of a gamble, but partner was committing to small slam without knowing you have more than an ace and a king, and you have two aces and a king.
(*) Over a reverse, it's common to agree either to play 2N or the cheaper of 2N and the 4th suit as a weakness showing bid (so that all bids at the 3 level can be game forcing). If 2N is the weakness showing bid, then 2♠ (fourth suit forcing) is right here. If 2♠ is weakness showing, then 2N (which would be forcing to game) is the right bid.
(**) Surely this is a cue in support of clubs. 4♦ would be less clear; if certain partner would take it as a cue and not an offer to play, it's a better bid (and makes the subsequent auction better).
(***) Of course this shows 1st round control - it commits to small slam and hence has to be looking for grand. And probably a void - otherwise partner would use blackwood.
This would mean the bidding goes
1♣ - 1♥
2♦ - 2♠/2N(*)
3♣ - 3N
4♣ - 4♠(**)
5♥(***) - 7♣
The 7♣ bid is a bit of a gamble, but partner was committing to small slam without knowing you have more than an ace and a king, and you have two aces and a king.
(*) Over a reverse, it's common to agree either to play 2N or the cheaper of 2N and the 4th suit as a weakness showing bid (so that all bids at the 3 level can be game forcing). If 2N is the weakness showing bid, then 2♠ (fourth suit forcing) is right here. If 2♠ is weakness showing, then 2N (which would be forcing to game) is the right bid.
(**) Surely this is a cue in support of clubs. 4♦ would be less clear; if certain partner would take it as a cue and not an offer to play, it's a better bid (and makes the subsequent auction better).
(***) Of course this shows 1st round control - it commits to small slam and hence has to be looking for grand. And probably a void - otherwise partner would use blackwood.
#6
Posted 2014-March-03, 03:49
1C-1H-3C-3NT would be the most likely start to this. From there it's system-dependent, but I would bid 4NT if my partner knew it was not a quant invite to 6NT.
Also, if it starts 1C-1H-3C, South has to feel like 3NT is a massive underbid, so perhaps he bids Blackwood.
Either way this is a good challenge hands for newer/average partnerships to get to 6C and for advanced partnerships to find 7C.
I strongly recommend that beginners never, ever bid 7 of anything unless it's an absolute certainty on simple bidding. This will happen maybe once every 1,000 deals.
An example: your partner opens the bidding with 1H and you hold:
♠AKQJ953
♥K7
♦AKQ
♣7
Partner opened and you're staring at a solid spade suit and 22 HCP. Ask him how many aces he has and bid either 6♠ or 7♠ (or 7NT) depending on his answer.
Also, if it starts 1C-1H-3C, South has to feel like 3NT is a massive underbid, so perhaps he bids Blackwood.
Either way this is a good challenge hands for newer/average partnerships to get to 6C and for advanced partnerships to find 7C.
I strongly recommend that beginners never, ever bid 7 of anything unless it's an absolute certainty on simple bidding. This will happen maybe once every 1,000 deals.
An example: your partner opens the bidding with 1H and you hold:
♠AKQJ953
♥K7
♦AKQ
♣7
Partner opened and you're staring at a solid spade suit and 22 HCP. Ask him how many aces he has and bid either 6♠ or 7♠ (or 7NT) depending on his answer.
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
Page 1 of 1