Page 1 of 1
support doubles...
#1
Posted 2013-December-20, 06:05
Which of the following penalty oriented?, which are support or take out?
Assume a 5543 system (Even when that is impossible, but assume it does)
A
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (nat)
X
B
1♣-p-1♠-2♣ (nat)
X
C
1♦-p-1♠-2♦ (nat)
X
D
1♥-p-1♠-2♥ (nat!)
X
E
1♣-p-1♠-3♣ (nat)
X
F
1♦-p-1♠-3♦ (nat)
X
G
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (2 suiter)
X
H
1♣-p-1♠-2NT (2 suiter)
X
Assume a 5543 system (Even when that is impossible, but assume it does)
A
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (nat)
X
B
1♣-p-1♠-2♣ (nat)
X
C
1♦-p-1♠-2♦ (nat)
X
D
1♥-p-1♠-2♥ (nat!)
X
E
1♣-p-1♠-3♣ (nat)
X
F
1♦-p-1♠-3♦ (nat)
X
G
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (2 suiter)
X
H
1♣-p-1♠-2NT (2 suiter)
X
#2
Posted 2013-December-20, 07:46
For me:
Penalty(-ish): AEFH
Support: BCDG
Rik
Penalty(-ish): AEFH
Support: BCDG
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#3
Posted 2013-December-20, 09:06
I vote "G"=support, B thru F penalty oriented, and A/H cooperative with typically a too-strong for 1NT opener (18+). The examples, except "G" should be high-risk to the frisky.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#4
Posted 2013-December-20, 10:30
Here is one more:
I.
1♣- 1♦ - 1♥- 1NT
DBL = ?
I.
1♣- 1♦ - 1♥- 1NT
DBL = ?
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#5
Posted 2013-December-30, 23:17
Very tempting to vary meaning by context, but I'm not so sure it gains more than a simple "all are support". I've found playing support doubles over 3-level preempts by RHO works well (adjusting for required playing strength).
Even when RHO show 15-18 (1NT) responder is better placed to compete effectively knowing if opener has 0-2, 3, or 4 trumps. Penalty (18-0-6-16) is too small a target; competing to the 2-level accurately gains in frequency in these auctions.
Even when RHO show 15-18 (1NT) responder is better placed to compete effectively knowing if opener has 0-2, 3, or 4 trumps. Penalty (18-0-6-16) is too small a target; competing to the 2-level accurately gains in frequency in these auctions.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#8
Posted 2013-December-31, 12:48
Support double applies only below the 2-level, so EFH are out.
Auction G is support double - just like support redouble if RHO had made a takeout double.
Natural 1NT overcalls get doubled for penalty, so A is out.
That leaves BCD. I honestly have no idea what is standard (nor whether there is one). I think on BC takeout or support are most useful.
Auction G is support double - just like support redouble if RHO had made a takeout double.
Natural 1NT overcalls get doubled for penalty, so A is out.
That leaves BCD. I honestly have no idea what is standard (nor whether there is one). I think on BC takeout or support are most useful.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#9
Posted 2013-December-31, 15:54
This is all assuming a 2/1/sayc based natural system, like the OP implied.
A
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (nat)
X
Penalty for me (15+ HCP or tricks)
B
1♣-p-1♠-2♣ (nat)
X
Support
C
1♦-p-1♠-2♦ (nat)
X
Support
D
1♥-p-1♠-2♥ (nat!)
X
Support
E
1♣-p-1♠-3♣ (nat)
X
Penalty (I do not play support X's above 2 of the supported suit)
F
1♦-p-1♠-3♦ (nat)
X
Penalty (I do not play support X's above 2 of the supported suit)
G
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (2 suiter)
X
Support
H
1♣-p-1♠-2NT (2 suiter)
X
Extra values, no clear direction.
A
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (nat)
X
Penalty for me (15+ HCP or tricks)
B
1♣-p-1♠-2♣ (nat)
X
Support
C
1♦-p-1♠-2♦ (nat)
X
Support
D
1♥-p-1♠-2♥ (nat!)
X
Support
E
1♣-p-1♠-3♣ (nat)
X
Penalty (I do not play support X's above 2 of the supported suit)
F
1♦-p-1♠-3♦ (nat)
X
Penalty (I do not play support X's above 2 of the supported suit)
G
1♣-p-1♠-1NT (2 suiter)
X
Support
H
1♣-p-1♠-2NT (2 suiter)
X
Extra values, no clear direction.
Chris Gibson
#10
Posted 2013-December-31, 17:27
For me:
A: extra values / penalty
B-D: support (almost always can pass to penalize and partner, marked with shortage, will double back in)
E-F: extra values; I don't play support doubles this high but these tend to imply more "convertible values" (like 18-19 balanced) than anything else
G-H: extras, defensive values -- generally I play unusual vs. unusual takes priority over support doubles in these situations
A: extra values / penalty
B-D: support (almost always can pass to penalize and partner, marked with shortage, will double back in)
E-F: extra values; I don't play support doubles this high but these tend to imply more "convertible values" (like 18-19 balanced) than anything else
G-H: extras, defensive values -- generally I play unusual vs. unusual takes priority over support doubles in these situations
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#11
Posted 2013-December-31, 17:58
I'm old school. If I bid a suit and then they bid my suit naturally, double says that I actually have that suit. Qxxx doesn't count.
#12
Posted 2014-January-08, 11:34
None of your examples follow the standard support double structure. It is usually 1 apple, pass by LHO, 1 orange(usually a major), 2 lemons. Now 2 oranges show four card support and double shows 3-card orange support.
A and G are similar to the support double structure. What percentage of players are playing support doubles on the three level?
If they bid my suit and I double, that is for penalties.
A and G are similar to the support double structure. What percentage of players are playing support doubles on the three level?
If they bid my suit and I double, that is for penalties.
Page 1 of 1