Do we agree with the take out double here?
Page 1 of 1
Light take-out doubles
#2
Posted 2013-October-21, 07:08
Vul against not I think its borderline, but I think I would double.
#5
Posted 2013-October-21, 07:26
Yes.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#8
Posted 2013-October-21, 07:57
OK, First no vote here. There may be one more out there.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#9
Posted 2013-October-21, 08:04
Would not consider passing, but p knows that.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
#12
Posted 2013-October-21, 11:18
I thought it obvious too, but we got into trouble on this hand.
Partner held
Axx
J87X
KTX
Qxx
And it went 1C X 3C X
P 3S AP
2 off for not a good score
Partner held
Axx
J87X
KTX
Qxx
And it went 1C X 3C X
P 3S AP
2 off for not a good score
#13
Posted 2013-October-21, 11:27
I would vote no.
WIthout full values for my takeout double, I want perfect shape. The three card heart holding is not perfect, so I vote no.
WIthout full values for my takeout double, I want perfect shape. The three card heart holding is not perfect, so I vote no.
#14
Posted 2013-October-21, 12:24
Agree with ArtK78
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
#15
Posted 2013-October-21, 12:29
mr1303, on 2013-October-21, 11:18, said:
I thought it obvious too, but we got into trouble on this hand.
Partner held
Axx
J87X
KTX
Qxx
And it went 1C X 3C X
P 3S AP
2 off for not a good score
Partner held
Axx
J87X
KTX
Qxx
And it went 1C X 3C X
P 3S AP
2 off for not a good score
Were you on the same wavelength about responsive doubles? It looks as though you thought it showed both majors, and partner didn't.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#16
Posted 2013-October-21, 12:31
The bid after the responsive Double is 3D by doubler. RD can then bid 3H if he is 4-4M, but he doesn't have to be 4-4M. He would have just bid a Major with 5.
The original double is o.k. by me.
The original double is o.k. by me.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#17
Posted 2013-October-21, 14:20
mr1303, on 2013-October-21, 06:51, said:
Do we agree with the take out double here?
Agree in ANY vulnerability & scoring.
I don't like 3♠ bid by you, i would have bid 3♦. I will not get into long debate about responsive doubles and continuation, Andy tried to say briefly.
And what does this result has anything to do with whether we pass or X over 1 cl with this hand ? Assume you passed 1♣. would you also pass in peace if bidding went 1cl-pass-3cl-pass-pass ? In fact you are very unlikely to find your best fit on this hand, had you decided to pass over 1♣. You would be playing 3♥
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0731/f07315330c72d721a433df91b1dcf64ddc348248" alt="Posted Image"
If you claim that you would have also passed 3♣, u can disregard my comment.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
Page 1 of 1