BBO Discussion Forums: Are stoppers for losers? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Are stoppers for losers?

Poll: Are stoppers for losers? (25 member(s) have cast votes)

Your call?

  1. 2H (1 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

  2. 2S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 2N (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 3C (1 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

  5. 3D (19 votes [76.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 76.00%

  6. 3N (3 votes [12.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.00%

  7. Other (1 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-October-18, 05:35



Playing weak NT, 4cM.

ahydra
0

#2 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2013-October-18, 05:42

I would like to know at least some things about the system over 1 2.
But I guess that 3 and 3 are non forcing, else, why did you ask?

In the way I play it, 2 and 2 shows 4+ cards, as partner did not deny these suits, so I need to find another bid. I try 3 . Partners most likely shape is something around 3361, so I will be fine if he has no other bid beyond 3.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#3 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2013-October-18, 05:46

I also bid 3D. If partner cannot move beyond this, we should have no game. Partner has denied a weak NT, and opposite some of the rubbish I open on these days, 5 of a minor looks a long way off.
0

#4 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-October-18, 06:52

3
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-October-18, 07:05

I suppose with the really bad 2/1 hands (8-10 hcp, or are those not allowed at all?) you could pass 2D? Then 3D seems fine even if it's NF.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2013-October-18, 07:11

If you decide to GF you do so with 2H. This doesn't promise four cards.
0

#7 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-October-18, 07:16

We play a modern style so 2/1 promises enough to GF opposite a strong NT. 2D here is NF, as are the 2NT, 3C and 3D responder's rebids.

ahydra
0

#8 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,289
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-18, 07:16

Hi,

I would love to make a forcing 3D call.
If cant, because I play Acol, I would go with 3NT, since in this case
2NT would also be NF, suit bids would show values.

If I read the system comments correct this means 3NT for me.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-18, 08:24

3

I think you have to pray for a 3nt bid from partners side. 2 might get the job done but a raise from partner would be ugly.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#10 User is offline   DJNeill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 455
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsboro, OR USA
  • Interests:current events, long-distance cycling

Posted 2013-October-18, 08:31

2H - third suit forcing (see WJ05). Does not promise 4 cards, forces to game. My fit is too good in diamonds to stop below 3N now. If partner raises to 3H, 3S now should be a stall. If partner bids 2S 4th suit we can try 3D. If partner rebid 2N, I'll try 3N. If partner rebids 3D, I'll try 3S as a stall, still unwilling to give up on 3NT yet.
0

#11 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-October-19, 08:22

Thanks for replies all. I thought a non-forcing 3D was a bit wimpish with this hand so tried 2H and raised partner's 2NT to 3NT. He had something like KJxx Jx AKxxx xx and the defence simply cashed 4 hearts and the SA for a complete bottom (forgot to specify MPs in the OP, sorry!)

Of course, if RHO had been one of the weaker players in the club I might have got away with that (a spade, the unbid suit, might be led instead of a heart). But in general, after this start and assuming I want to GF, how can I find out about stoppers in both majors? Perhaps we should play 3C as forcing?

ahydra
0

#12 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2013-October-19, 09:03

My suggestion is not to play Acol, for this very reason.
0

#13 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-19, 09:06

View Postmr1303, on 2013-October-19, 09:03, said:

My suggestion is not to play Acol, for this very reason.


No system works all the time and sometimes you just have to take your juice. Partners are a factor too. My pard is so glass 1/2 full I get away with the wimpy 3 call all the time.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#14 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2013-October-20, 06:19

This problem is a matter of judgement: is the hand worth forcing to game? Your answer to that may actually depend on system, but that's a sort of backwards decision.

Playing 2/1, what on earth are you supposed to bid if you don't want to drive game? I guess 2NT in response to 1D? That's such a horrible misdescription of the hand that I would respond 2C and raise 2D to 3D i.e. I would overbid to describe my hand.
Playing Acol, you have a nasty call over 2D if you want to drive game, because neither 2H nor 3NT are very helpful. So playing Acol I would raise 2D to 3D i.e. I would underbid in order to describe my hand.

Simply saying 'don't play Acol' doesn't solve the problem. In fact, playing Acol on this particular hand gets you to a nice 3D contract. If instead partner had Axxx Jxx AKxxx x then opener's bidding would be the same and playing 2/1 you should end in a good 3NT contract and a boring 3D+1 playing Acol.
0

#15 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2013-October-20, 07:43

View PostFrancesHinden, on 2013-October-20, 06:19, said:

Playing 2/1, what on earth are you supposed to bid if you don't want to drive game? I guess 2NT in response to 1D?


I have 3 available as an Invitational jump shift and for me it's a clear choice on this hand with the Majors wide open.. Without that I suspect 2 followed by 3 should be non-forcing and I would choose that (although I really hate that treatment).
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users