BBO Discussion Forums: Personal Ethics - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Personal Ethics

Poll: Personal Ethics (21 member(s) have cast votes)

In the situation below I would call the director...

  1. Never or almost never (11 votes [52.38%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 52.38%

  2. If my opponents are inexperienced (8 votes [38.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 38.10%

  3. Usually or always (1 votes [4.76%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.76%

  4. Other (please explain) (1 votes [4.76%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.76%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2013-October-11, 20:06

View Postjeffford76, on 2013-October-11, 11:40, said:

I think you can know once dummy hits the table.

I was talking about during the bidding.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#22 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,603
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-12, 20:01

View Postblackshoe, on 2013-October-11, 20:06, said:

I was talking about during the bidding.

No one expects you to call the TD about your partner's action during the bidding.

The question was what to do once dummy hits and you can see that partner appears to have taken advantage of the UI.

#23 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2013-October-12, 23:16

If I can see it, so can opponents. It's not my job to think for them.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#24 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2013-October-13, 04:37

View Postblackshoe, on 2013-October-12, 23:16, said:

If I can see it, so can opponents. It's not my job to think for them.


The point is that the inexperienced opponents might have no clue and might not even know that they might be entitled to a ruling in their favour.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#25 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2013-October-13, 06:36

View Postjeffford76, on 2013-October-10, 16:19, said:

Partner forgets a convention and bids a game forcing 2 (that you alert and the opponents ask about) in the unopposed auction 1 - 1 - 1. They then pass your 2NT rebid, so it's clear that their earlier bid was a misbid to everyone at the table before the opening lead is made.

When dummy comes down, you realize that it is likely that if the director is called the score will be adjusted to 3NT down one more trick than the amount 2NT is down given the unauthorized information from your alert. Would you call the director?

(This isn't in one of the laws forums, because I think it is clear that you have no legal obligation to call.)


Personal Ethics....
anybody else who thinks something is wrong with that terminology ?
Bob Herreman
0

#26 User is offline   Adam1105 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 2008-May-11

Posted 2013-October-13, 20:28

View Postakwoo, on 2013-October-10, 21:41, said:

I would make sure the opponents knew their rights to call the director, but would not call the director myself. And I would try to do this before dummy was actually faced.


This is 100% the correct answer. Bridge NEEDS to have maximum ethics — like golf.
0

#27 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,460
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2013-October-15, 08:37

The ethics of the game are defined in the Laws, and Regulations made under the aegis of those Laws. If you follow them, you are being Ethical.

You may choose to stick exactly to that level of Ethics, or you may choose to go forward from there. In either case, you are being Ethical, and others have no cause against you; if you are known as one who plays right down to the line, every time, expect to have others, even those who normally are beyond what is legally required, stick to the line against you. You have no cause for complaint against that, either.

Having said that, those who go beyond what is legally required, and are upset that other opponents do not give them the same leeway, have my sympathy, and require instruction (and, from me, it frequently consists of the previous paragraph) - but that's it.

Note: as can likely be seen from the left side of this post, I adhere more to the "play right to the Law line" than many; and fully expect - in fact, sometimes insist even when the opponents want to "ignore" something - to be held to the same standard. I wish that more players knew the right, Legal, way to waive away an infraction, of course.

Edit: Note that the ethics in Golf - many adhered more in the breach than in the fact, at least outside tournament play - are also written into the Laws. The difference is that in golf, you are expected to know, and apply, the Law. Putting the first half of that expectation into Bridge would, IMHO, be an improvement.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#28 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2013-October-15, 09:06

Well said!
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users