Help
This one hit me yesterday and I seemed stuck. 2NT seems wrong, bidding a suit shows 5, game is going to be passed...So what's the plan? Okay, so 2NT may not be wrong. It seemed wrong at the time.
Continuation in spoiler:
Spoiler
Page 1 of 1
Your plan playing Standard?
#1
- Secretary Bird
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,457
- Joined: 2003-July-12
- Gender:Male
- Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16
Posted 2013-October-08, 10:17
This one hit me yesterday and I seemed stuck. 2NT seems wrong, bidding a suit shows 5, game is going to be passed...So what's the plan? Okay, so 2NT may not be wrong. It seemed wrong at the time.
Continuation in spoiler:
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2013-October-08, 10:40
Barry Crane's system notes: Queen is under the Jack in a Major 
Rodwell: Cross to the spade ten and immediately lead the heart Jack
Rodwell: Cross to the spade ten and immediately lead the heart Jack
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#3
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2013-October-08, 10:51
My idea is to play the two top hearts. If the Queen does not drop, play for the club Ace to be onside and not with the Queen of hearts.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,251
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2013-October-08, 10:59
Does the world really open that 2♣ ?
#5
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 2013-August-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Bulgaria
- Interests:NFL, NBA, poker
Posted 2013-October-08, 11:38
Cyberyeti, on 2013-October-08, 10:59, said:
Does the world really open that 2♣ ?
It's a clear 1♠ opening to me, but I would wish I was playing Precision when I get that hand.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,866
- Joined: 2008-July-13
Posted 2013-October-08, 13:04
i would bid 2nt over 2s and consider it quite obvious and plan to power to slam later.
as for opening 2c, i'm very conservative with 2c openers. i like to have play for game opposite a balanced yarborough with no particular fit. this is very close to that level required even for me, but falls just short. i have no problem with anyone who does open 2c.
as for opening 2c, i'm very conservative with 2c openers. i like to have play for game opposite a balanced yarborough with no particular fit. this is very close to that level required even for me, but falls just short. i have no problem with anyone who does open 2c.
#7
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2013-October-08, 14:13
2NT looks obvious.
I'd win the diamond in hand, cash ♠10, cash two more diamonds and three more spades, and then decide what to do. I could use the spade and diamond breaks to tell me which way to finesse in hearts, or I could try Ken's twofer, or I might get something useful from their discards.
I'd win the diamond in hand, cash ♠10, cash two more diamonds and three more spades, and then decide what to do. I could use the spade and diamond breaks to tell me which way to finesse in hearts, or I could try Ken's twofer, or I might get something useful from their discards.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#8
- Tubthumper
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,835
- Joined: 2007-July-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, OR, USA
- Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.
Posted 2013-October-08, 16:05
2N seems perfect. If partner raises to 3N, I'll bid 6. If partner bids 3 of anything else, I'll force to slam in that suit.
Chris Gibson
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,260
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-October-15, 02:48
2NT.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,092
- Joined: 2005-June-27
Posted 2013-October-15, 05:43
Cyberyeti, on 2013-October-08, 10:59, said:
Does the world really open that 2♣ ?
It is a 4 loser hand. 2♣ has no rebid problems. This can not be said if the bidding starts 1♠ and you are lucky enough to receive a 1NT response.
I have no qualms opening with 2♣ if
1) you have the majors
2) you are unbalanced
3) HCP strength is within a 2NT opening.
Such hands make game most of the time where partner will pass a one level opening.
Look at the actual hands.
Responder will immediately visualize slam after 2♣ and can find out even after the heart fit comes to light that 6NT must be superior to 6♥.
I do not see such a clear route to slam after opening 1♠. (The best slam is probably 6♦, but hard to reach)
I never understood the modern trends to light openings and at the same time the trend to extremely conservative 2♣ opening requirements.
People claiming they can handle this wide range effectively are kidding themselves.
Sure the cost with this strange philosophie is not when you open 2♣, but when you decide against.
Why do people shrug their shoulder after going down in game when they opened 1♠, but consider it a mortal sin if this happens after a 2♣ opening?
I do not get it.
Rainer Herrmann
Page 1 of 1