Bidding help needed
#1
Posted 2013-September-30, 05:22
S / all red
North and South hold:
North
♠ Q
♥ Q 9 7 5 2
♦ A K 8
♣ 10 5 4 3
South
♠ A J 9 5 3
♥ A K J 8 6
♦ -
♣ A 8 6
The bidding:
South North
1♠ 2♥
4♦ 4♥
all pass
1♠ = 11-19 HCP, 5+-card ♠
2♥ = 10+ HCP, 5+-card ♥
4♦ = singleton or void in ♦, heart support, slam interest in ♥
What went wrong in missing 6♥? Any suggestion?
Thx
Jan
#2
Posted 2013-September-30, 05:48
#3
Posted 2013-September-30, 05:48
#4
Posted 2013-September-30, 06:19
paulg, on 2013-September-30, 05:48, said:
Worst hand N can have is xxx, Qxxxx, AQ, Qxx where it's a lot worse than a finesse but I agree S should do more. While I don't think S can find out about N's stiff spade to bid the grand, the small should be bid, possible continuation
4♠(cue)-5♦(cue, specifically A opposite known shortage)
5N (anything else ? no K♠)-6♦(K as well as A, no club control)
6♥
How would we bid this:
1♠-2♥
2N (GF not necessarily balanced)-3♣(nat-ish, may be Hxx, but ♦ will be worse if it is)
3♥-4♦(double ♦cue, no black high card, we use 3N to replace the most expensive cue so 4♦ = AK and no black high card)
4N(♠ cue, 4♠=keycard)-5♥(nothing else to show, no minor suit Q as I've already denied K♣ and shown K♦)
5N(show me something you haven't already shown me, I don't have K♠ as I'd have bid 5♠ if I had)-7♥(well you must be looking for a stiff spade then as I've denied everything else)
#5
Posted 2013-October-01, 14:22
Hilver, on 2013-September-30, 05:22, said:
South North
1♠ 2♥
4♦ 4♥
all pass
What went wrong in missing 6♥? Any suggestion?
I just replied to this in another forum ! North is minimum with a singleton in partners first suit, poor trumps, likely wasted values in diamonds and no high card in the other suit partner may have some length in so 4♥ is clearly right. On the other hand South can see slam will make opposite many minimum 2♥ bids so should make another try.
#6
Posted 2013-October-01, 15:34
We don't need to bid on the expectation partner has the worst hand possible.
#7
Posted 2013-October-01, 22:06
#8
Posted 2013-October-01, 22:53
#9
Posted 2013-October-01, 22:53
#10
Posted 2013-October-01, 23:13
South must act again over 4♥. Slam is not guaranteed, but there are so many hands consistent with the auction on which slam is cold or at least has good play that South cannot pass 4♥.
#12
Posted 2013-October-02, 05:01
keylime, on 2013-October-01, 22:53, said:
This is a great hand to justify forcing to slam from S. Even with KQJxx opposite our void we have good chances for 12 tricks!
George Carlin
#13
Posted 2013-October-02, 09:29
mike777, on 2013-October-01, 15:34, said:
As I pointed out in the other thread, I think the 6♦ continuation over partner's 5♥ is an SSA for spades (5♠ Q ask; 5NT K ask; 6♣ club SSA; 6♦ spades SSA). General invites are all well and good looking at both hands but in the real world partner has to have some sort of idea what is required to go on. I have more sympathy with Cyberyeti's source of tricks ask - at least partner has some chance of knowing what to do.
#14
Posted 2013-October-02, 09:54
Zelandakh, on 2013-October-02, 09:29, said:
KISS given this is the natural thread:
or given pard is unlimited over 5h,
5s is q ask
5nt shows KS, grand try
6c shows KC denies KS
6d denies both, grand try.
Or you can play some more complicated toy if you remember it.
#15
Posted 2013-October-02, 12:38
I think the proper bid over 4H is 5C.
#16
Posted 2013-October-02, 17:14
With 4 key cards what is the point of 5D-exclusion ? You know ahead of time that the reply will be 5H .
You could just go regular RKC and find out about the ♦A, but I also don't see a big advantage.
If North's points is "stuff" in ♦, you get ♣ discard(s).
If no stuff in ♦ then there must be stuff in the black suits.
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#17
Posted 2013-October-02, 22:00
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2013-October-02, 17:14, said:
With 4 key cards what is the point of 5D-exclusion ? You know ahead of time that the reply will be 5H .
You could just go regular RKC and find out about the ♦A, but I also don't see a big advantage.
If North's points is "stuff" in ♦, you get ♣ discard(s).
If no stuff in ♦ then there must be stuff in the black suits.
ok but I understand that north is unlimited after 2h.
#18
Posted 2013-October-08, 06:18
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2013-October-02, 17:14, said:
The advantage would be having a chance to find a grand when it is right. Maybe North has a black king or two.
mike777, on 2013-October-02, 22:00, said:
But not after 4♥, which was the decision point being discussed.