BBO Discussion Forums: Bid this unbalanced hand after 1NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bid this unbalanced hand after 1NT

#1 User is offline   gambolero 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: 2013-June-27

Posted 2013-September-03, 01:33




I am used to four suit transfers where we have the transfer to show minor single suiters and so 3 here would promise 4 spades, longer diamonds and game forcing, however, at the urging of partner we are playing minor suit stayman.

But now we need a way to show strong minor single suiters so 3 here doesn't promise 4 spades right?

How do you show this hand without missing a possible 4--4 spade fit?
3NT (which would promise 4 spades) seems unappealing.
0

#2 User is offline   GHS_K_Chow 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2010-December-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 2013-September-03, 03:40

What are your 3 level bids? Or 2N?

This should always guarantee 4S so you don't miss the Spade fit. If worse comes to worse, use minor stayman and 4D for 6 card diamond slam try. If partner responds clubs, you'll override clubs for diamonds and if partner denies 4 clubs anyway, 4D can only promise 6 diamonds and say nothing about clubs since you would have raised with 4
0

#3 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,250
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-September-03, 04:01

Have you discussed what 1N-2-2-2 shows here ? We use it for various hands with ambitions beyond game, but I don't believe there is a standard.

Also what is 3 for you ? many people will play this as 5+/4 forcing.

You say you use MSS, but by what method in what sequence ?
1

#4 User is offline   vang 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 2004-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania
  • Interests:Linux

Posted 2013-September-03, 04:33

View PostCyberyeti, on 2013-September-03, 04:01, said:

[...]
Also what is 3 for you ? many people will play this as 5+/4 forcing.
[...]


this is standard
0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-September-03, 05:31

Even if 3 doesn't promise four spades, why would you miss 4-4 spade fits this way? If partner has 4 spades, he can bid 3, and you can raise him.
I mean, nothing wrong with adding a gadget here to improve things, but I see no problem that you need to solve.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#6 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,250
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-September-03, 05:58

(re 1N-2-2-3 as forcing)

View Postvang, on 2013-September-03, 04:33, said:

this is standard


It may be modern standard, or standard in strong no trump land, old style weak no trump it's to play with 4/6 and we still play it that way.
0

#7 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2013-September-03, 14:34

I'm at a loss to see what the problem is. I think we need to know what your replies of 2, 2NT and 3 used to mean before MSS, how you want to play MSS, and what causes a problem. If you played 2-under minor transfers, are you happy switching to 1-under?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users